From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31AA5C43217 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 01:08:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229608AbiJSBIz (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Oct 2022 21:08:55 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51978 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229719AbiJSBIj (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Oct 2022 21:08:39 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D23BDFC08; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 18:08:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098420.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 29J0ud4n015004; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 01:08:14 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=message-id : subject : from : to : cc : date : in-reply-to : references : content-type : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=PTXFKiaqw8WDi1XGVH0av05QNVaP7YEtjK+e1UbuFx4=; b=UGYlspng/kc9By85lcBcW+vfvU4Iu2DJdZOce4gMsel9NVX97wQSQrJk0EA3Q6GokX4/ G7dku1aUznvJ5+8f8TeMcIZvSbgjKWtPO+nP3f2X2d39piPXH5EFsnlDOYldoqr1x5CV 9Njauod594rriORvUSf5GE93d9pz5cd2WR7QRK8eiks9IU2chjhim7qAo/VxXUMnHnIF ZG9lbunPOavISxxp+VQE1sqBDyOM7sECsSejStuBIssSSgM4y420Xfk9v8pv19sriXMR d5+Pi6kXUg4nBt+VJgXOLqNNDFMQ7idlzhU21rOFk0061ER4PawgBi/Ky4TGVc/Y0+Hm qw== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3ka7510dc1-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 19 Oct 2022 01:08:13 +0000 Received: from m0098420.ppops.net (m0098420.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 29J10BU1029534; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 01:07:57 GMT Received: from ppma01wdc.us.ibm.com (fd.55.37a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.55.85.253]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3ka7510cdc-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 19 Oct 2022 01:07:57 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma01wdc.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma01wdc.us.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 29J17AkV008974; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 01:07:46 GMT Received: from b03cxnp07029.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03cxnp07029.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.16]) by ppma01wdc.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3k9be2axsw-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 19 Oct 2022 01:07:46 +0000 Received: from smtpav03.dal12v.mail.ibm.com ([9.208.128.129]) by b03cxnp07029.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 29J17igc24380140 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 19 Oct 2022 01:07:44 GMT Received: from smtpav03.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 221D458060; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 01:07:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav03.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79D745803F; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 01:07:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sig-9-65-232-148.ibm.com (unknown [9.65.232.148]) by smtpav03.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 01:07:44 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <90f8940cff5eeef7917e2b11a07e41b32b207ffa.camel@linux.ibm.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] ima: Handle -ESTALE returned by ima_filter_rule_match() From: Mimi Zohar To: "Guozihua (Scott)" , dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com, paul@paul-moore.com, jmorris@namei.org, serge@hallyn.com Cc: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, Janne Karhunen , Roberto Sassu Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2022 21:07:44 -0400 In-Reply-To: <2f032b6c-ecf2-5a41-dc38-e6ab0a2d7885@huawei.com> References: <20220921125804.59490-1-guozihua@huawei.com> <20220921125804.59490-3-guozihua@huawei.com> <77c9c86b-85a6-aa87-e084-59a70bb47167@huawei.com> <7ac3e330-e77c-95d8-7d3b-29e243b57251@huawei.com> <5e304b17fe709d2b2f30b991d5ffc4711d27a075.camel@linux.ibm.com> <2f032b6c-ecf2-5a41-dc38-e6ab0a2d7885@huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5 (3.28.5-18.el8) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: y8BArRBy6mkseiO0clCZ7DUsoiSTqqnj X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: lwyednaTJSdh7rQf1GNl4DHVbsSvMc_Z X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.895,Hydra:6.0.545,FMLib:17.11.122.1 definitions=2022-10-18_10,2022-10-18_01,2022-06-22_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxlogscore=999 clxscore=1011 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2209130000 definitions=main-2210190004 Precedence: bulk List-ID: On Tue, 2022-10-18 at 16:43 +0800, Guozihua (Scott) wrote: > On 2022/9/28 22:11, Mimi Zohar wrote: > > > > After reviewing this patch set again, the code looks fine. The commit > > message is still a bit off, but I've pushed the patch set out to next- > > integrity-testing, waiting for some Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags. > > > > Hi Mimi, > > How's this patch going? I see Roberto is replying with a Reviewed-by. I'd really like to see a "Tested-by" tag as well. Are you able to force the scenario? -- thanks, Mimi