Re: [PATCH v7 0/9] Implement LANDLOCK_ADD_RULE_QUIET

[Tingmao Wang <m@maowtm.org>]

On 1/19/26 14:26, Justin Suess wrote:
> [...]
> Hey Tingmao,
> 
> Thank you for your work on this patch-- I don’t have any further nits,
> this looks very clean.
> 
> Do you plan to rebase/resend this series on the current mic-next branch
> at some point? It would be helpful to be able to test it alongside some
> of the other Landlock series that are in flight.> 
> Feedback on the latest version of the series has been fairly quiet so far,
> and having it rebased would make cross-testing easier. I’d also rebase the
> LANDLOCK_ADD_RULE_NO_INHERIT series on top for further consideration.

Hi Justin,

Thanks for the reminder :)
I don't have any changes waiting for v8, and all the patches except one
already applies cleanly, and the one that conflicted was due to a fixed
typo, in patch 6, which git can also sort out automatically with git am
--3way:

    $ b4 am '<cover.1766330134.git.m@maowtm.org>'
      (ignore to suggestion to checkout the base commit - this can be
      applied onto mic/next cleanly)
    $ git am --3way ./v7_20251221_m_implement_landlock_add_rule_quiet.mbx

I should probably still resend at some point anyway just to make it easier
for everybody - but given this is lower priority (rightfully) than the
socket stuff, and review is not blocked anyway, I guess I will wait a bit
before spamming :D

Kind regards,
Tingmao