From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9135DC433EF for ; Thu, 7 Jul 2022 08:55:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235147AbiGGIzJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jul 2022 04:55:09 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42764 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235020AbiGGIzJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jul 2022 04:55:09 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-x12f.google.com (mail-lf1-x12f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50BFB326E5 for ; Thu, 7 Jul 2022 01:55:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf1-x12f.google.com with SMTP id t24so30004119lfr.4 for ; Thu, 07 Jul 2022 01:55:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=lY/lsBhQBz8QvneU4i4JCT6k5G987YiEUZYiRd9GBEo=; b=gkd1cvKO/qP8Vu3xfg+LDmsebuj4tLeI0t/TdkF86LKu1W85F1Av2N0ZzfHjljwE7N PaNz1D4O8yjdj+O13Cp6cyiLilpJdbpFyMau0AnIPQmtp73jJejbfGBfqTCzxWIbAowl ydX8hAVSY8+cihpy6+aRhCeKcGZa/RgOTFdld6aNPJcaV16dlppuXcY7NORY3rBCdz7t rIen2gBUvIydNzuOsHIuzepCfGEnLe9DUETre7YGd87tjCa/qZyQnIJfdX577Fu7J2zi g2mFVENSddhl91i6nvaNdFli9PTu6stBGAknoxa9Iopw9kHtz7mhRoJJQDhL9pixVwrc Ojhg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=lY/lsBhQBz8QvneU4i4JCT6k5G987YiEUZYiRd9GBEo=; b=iRjJcqD7q1L9e4gNUAdbQI28jlMuBDs3l3EO2Lgrx2dnA6oRuS3KRspNk9MPhXeHkP EYsGSTNxqqaD3vEe/7nC/F/rjMCbTB3kKJqMfIH4gpdXdcwUsohNkJ3aq8EYz6T9rtih o5ke6i0BS8qbY11p6BEzweqNEpjnUs9potiNNIJZoQN2ic53RlQ8d4KJelZpPcrBBMYr ijykYeybXfmC1Dvm9KX+5tX6TMLwIaOtjylX6Y8cSA6/UP6Xkq+kcqlUlCY0NKStxAOt tqJtwEWbwD05cPMcvjDoPe/2rHOIRf2DN5IOiTArDCcjfm5CwdIUjTegMlCjgIenfXoN FajQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora/v6YSEMbZhnKyVckWy2/cYiZNwN6zwKXQNVXyV4yqXUOKxZZyy XBcW4aWR1G/vKrD3LWUFFzJbqb+W7nzEFn1ILlM7XuYGbrI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1utqlabePJsikcWyGWtuuW15gYdEE8KElfH38UPRnPifHL4Jhu5NNl3aHHRpDGdz5yiNsIhE+zujgVYxn7PcjU= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3409:b0:47f:af5b:b24e with SMTP id i9-20020a056512340900b0047faf5bb24emr31050687lfr.555.1657184105444; Thu, 07 Jul 2022 01:55:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1980b9da-fa51-44c8-9d8c-160e9bffd327@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1980b9da-fa51-44c8-9d8c-160e9bffd327@gmail.com> From: Dmitry Kasatkin Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2022 11:54:54 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: LSM performance measurement To: Igor Zhbanov Cc: linux-security-module Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: On Wed, Jul 6, 2022 at 6:47 PM Igor Zhbanov wrote: > > Hi Dmitry, > > On 06.07.2022 18:22, Dmitry Kasatkin wrote: > > Could anybody suggest a good approach/test suite to measure LSMs > > runtime overheads? > > There are a couple of old articles on the same subject. > So, you can get some ideas from there: > - Evaluation of Performance of Secure OS Using Performance Evaluation > Mechanism of LSM-Based LSMPMON > http://www.swlab.cs.okayama-u.ac.jp/~yamauchi/research/sectech2010_yamamoto.pdf > - Analyzing the Overhead of Filesystem Protection Using Linux Security Modules > https://arxiv.org/pdf/2101.11611 > Hello, Thanks. Google also gave me that second article. Seems to be useful to read. -- Thanks, Dmitry