From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4762AC433EF for ; Wed, 6 Jul 2022 15:23:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229654AbiGFPXI (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jul 2022 11:23:08 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36132 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232575AbiGFPXI (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jul 2022 11:23:08 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-x129.google.com (mail-lf1-x129.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::129]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E7AC13D3C for ; Wed, 6 Jul 2022 08:23:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf1-x129.google.com with SMTP id bu42so6662932lfb.0 for ; Wed, 06 Jul 2022 08:23:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=ijBx4wXkhQ383VZeydtKSmqnuRY+UW9cAnNUcSCCt0s=; b=gIHHiPQep3iKhe7CM23AC5R/ogIyWvhaQ/0ylE0f1NZFxSvl00wvRN70KCV8Cj1Bzl oUStzOHFN5Kvl+CKEsppD5JNT/yxKuSITHWhfJZ9BHGd4U+GsyffahtC69z3eNb2rkun PNzZuMz0cj0h3OWosqVx1/cbjhI+dgtFBaxDZYBKuR9oQgHYx8hTAUoEbhHAl4xCO6or zLYZviU/G1trkYhYtlHfI3dPm95gtUNOEM7JSsUyDM1jYkJmk4OowFoWPRAXVTB4m96a oYANoLz8Colalgnq3w8Qnxl9rzrkWxUay4z8OEsMauHSd9LQQum86zd08GlgOiii1khh EOYw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=ijBx4wXkhQ383VZeydtKSmqnuRY+UW9cAnNUcSCCt0s=; b=DIaVLKGrpsp/QSjIY5JME2Rw/rxpsDouHIXqnZ0B/h469M9a1hgV8C0vQibJhRzgGb A2FKD8erE8shG3f7qun2Z1qxSJaPUHpyWLi/Btio6eUVY2YAlg3DXVyYhfaeNecGH8yq 6YdpkmJWii30u5mUDouYUvhnDr9U3G0D2UJiZTPINABTcw8aEqCoS22zevUNId5/JvPd IgB2S111m/di1uVR+RwX9lauNCoou6D9z3ubUteZL8ptZbPB8VxjzwDgUSOJwP1wHROw j6CuQ3rl8EuJSkB+raQoVivRRh6/qA5wOB345/5qiTbjMFG49DD0ljGVIluWd9fRhZdi n6Iw== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora+ktBDbJf1jkKfT/TKJ3vkTwMw3fhUamGBuAMCoPPlZRX7/o4hd 1n+Dg1j82RviWvqyh8SYQrAbXnohMUzbqBKw6F+YLdRqo4A= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1tbbZuaUb9EOAPp2xvKO+LHCorYV0Mgvs+UFZdp0hOQC+nlqS6lQdriVwfZCiJBmXqHiTJPMIMWc/e/W6GQ3z8= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3409:b0:47f:af5b:b24e with SMTP id i9-20020a056512340900b0047faf5bb24emr28230842lfr.555.1657120984234; Wed, 06 Jul 2022 08:23:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Dmitry Kasatkin Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2022 18:22:53 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: LSM performance measurement To: linux-security-module Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: Hi, Could anybody suggest a good approach/test suite to measure LSMs runtime overheads? -- Thanks, Dmitry