From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02F2A14262C for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2024 22:45:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723070725; cv=none; b=J8qZO9DP8luNbbRnNiZnAae/HBnGe3Qy3lKcSC3iBsPlEpADxxkbz3VO6oO8tiQWld+2Re25mmYIyFkNVCvo3gUHBJEDDOiPsktWKnuBs9sMOEzVT0sNHpOCIOWG70RUbYvME5mSvr1ICGK60cfLkLTHXs5qZQehoPXDPjxikyw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723070725; c=relaxed/simple; bh=TimWbGbKEBpeOmAdJ5yVwLShHbXvcyNTmCwEzBis98k=; h=MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=sofhwsSM5uj40Q7oKBzP7EMVNCBH69K/5l6BHk3/D6RkF4R1bH6REShsu7c+zP29RQBKfIFZflV2MW384ZiDNpb08zrWRnmOBmk6l29yBiWFPEf0ws5buCb2gFJhsclEMfTVCMEjOIOfMl8SLXoUCj3CqdIwEib6FlEBJIZKjxM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=k2HiNuHt; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="k2HiNuHt" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 92E01C4AF0E for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2024 22:45:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1723070724; bh=TimWbGbKEBpeOmAdJ5yVwLShHbXvcyNTmCwEzBis98k=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=k2HiNuHtGuYaGO5qSxswEBF9PgJT9EwsMhwRgxaLibyqPqPQcTJkK+l/mtVXaGF3/ oa0G570Wn4VyiLNtmTjXqB3U64ZCWEP9Qr7uymuwBDh1tiNtc7LW35C/I5+qa5jf+7 f5zzpf3ocpFbHW/Ru6sJXLzG4XxJoYtnZbj3OmrAggd/aXU2pwJOSlL5Srex7rOepe GS5OVORxUT64zrjn54V/fEcdgJfSgBuFAT9TcE6fkyuRNxAYPxVtfrs0t270jwSm5H UkIsHKu9xTO+vI+lHvV6llWVCZSmxFv/TXr3GeiF289p+guMQL+xIyyLvdKOXwiaSa EvEi/RqLvwZHQ== Received: by mail-lj1-f174.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2f16767830dso3182201fa.0 for ; Wed, 07 Aug 2024 15:45:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXednOyTR8O4rCjZaqQL3Gbg+skoVHXTA4QD2dzM++s9xJAiAHftfMwA3yL/7UsyPToS2KuRuZQnC1N1tyuRQ7j0gyyLhJL5zJVV6YnlsyeYgEghcFi X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwI6ZbatqMN6FDEhDrekNyt4HxSqbn+YhUGy8tSylfp7OF+QnQY CBjW0L/8qFjg0z7o/Nc75ZLYALt7CvIDYJev3JbPplp2II9M3AI5lgG7X89Q4D7hP4uX8CF+GJ+ pBo3iuzOnwp34Hf9cDusw7qhx4X/2QpyOYtNE X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHbIhEey5jtlYEQxpjmKc6VHQuykEyvScouTVZYeKTNFVE/BpVBGzuoNqq963ui64inoSQhGzztCqZsX8rAvaU= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:8096:0:b0:2ef:3250:d0d4 with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2f15ab5c7c8mr127508701fa.48.1723070722908; Wed, 07 Aug 2024 15:45:22 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20240801171747.3155893-1-kpsingh@kernel.org> <20240806022002.GA1570554@thelio-3990X> In-Reply-To: From: KP Singh Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2024 00:45:12 +0200 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] init/main.c: Initialize early LSMs after arch code To: Paul Moore Cc: Nathan Chancellor , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, bp@alien8.de, sfr@canb.auug.org.au, peterz@infradead.org, Guenter Roeck Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Aug 7, 2024 at 10:45=E2=80=AFPM Paul Moore wr= ote: > > On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 5:41=E2=80=AFPM Paul Moore w= rote: > > On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 10:20=E2=80=AFPM Nathan Chancellor wrote: > > ... > > > > For what it's worth, I have not noticed any issues in my -next testin= g > > > with this patch applied but I only build architectures that build wit= h > > > LLVM due to the nature of my work. If exposure to more architectures = is > > > desirable, perhaps Guenter Roeck would not mind testing it with his > > > matrix? > > > > Thanks Nathan. > > > > I think the additional testing would be great, KP can you please work > > with Guenter to set this up? > Adding Guenter directly to this thread. > Is that something you can do KP? I'm asking because I'm looking at > merging some other patches into lsm/dev and I need to make a decision > about the static call patches (hold off on merging the other patches > until the static call testing is complete, or yank the static call > patches until testing is complete and then re-merge). Understanding > your ability to do the additional testing, and a rough idea of how I have done the best of the testing I could do here. I think we should let this run its normal course and see if this breaks anything. I am not sure how testing is done before patches are merged and what else you expect me to do? > long it is going to take would be helpful here. > > -- > paul-moore.com