From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mjg59@google.com (Matthew Garrett) Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 14:24:34 -0800 Subject: [PATCH V3 2/2] IMA: Support using new creds in appraisal policy In-Reply-To: <1511908390.3473.30.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20171026084055.25482-1-mjg59@google.com> <20171026084055.25482-2-mjg59@google.com> <1511902135.3473.5.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1511904917.3473.15.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1511908390.3473.30.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Message-ID: To: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-security-module.vger.kernel.org Hm, sorry, missed this mail. On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 2:33 PM, Mimi Zohar wrote: > On Tue, 2017-11-28 at 13:37 -0800, Matthew Garrett wrote: >> security_task_getsecid(current) will give the same results as >> security_cred_getsecid(current_creds()) > > Unwinding security_task_getsecid(current) looks like it is using > real_cred, while current_cred() is using cred. Good question, and there's a current_real_cred() macro, so I should just use that instead. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html