linux-security-module.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@google.com>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-integrity <linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org>,
	LSM List <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org>,
	Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com>,
	"Bruno E . O . Meneguele" <bmeneg@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/ima: require signed kernel modules
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2019 14:27:30 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACdnJuuPyL3Qo4jAiJDQvUF9Ctch6Yo2bKezEuQ2KaM5ZZ1vqw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1550060279-8624-1-git-send-email-zohar@linux.ibm.com>

On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 4:18 AM Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> -       if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IMA_ARCH_POLICY) && arch_ima_get_secureboot())
> +       if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IMA_ARCH_POLICY) && arch_ima_get_secureboot()) {
> +               if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULE_SIG))
> +                       set_module_sig_enforced();
>                 return sb_arch_rules;

Linus previously pushed back on having the lockdown features
automatically enabled on secure boot systems. Why are we doing the
same in IMA?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-03-07 22:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-13 12:17 [PATCH v2] x86/ima: require signed kernel modules Mimi Zohar
2019-02-14 17:58 ` Luis Chamberlain
2019-02-14 18:47   ` Mimi Zohar
2019-03-07 22:27 ` Matthew Garrett [this message]
2019-03-07 22:34   ` Mimi Zohar
2019-03-07 22:36     ` Matthew Garrett
2019-03-07 22:41       ` Mimi Zohar
2019-03-07 22:45         ` Matthew Garrett

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CACdnJuuPyL3Qo4jAiJDQvUF9Ctch6Yo2bKezEuQ2KaM5ZZ1vqw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=mjg59@google.com \
    --cc=bmeneg@redhat.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=jeyu@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=seth.forshee@canonical.com \
    --cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).