Re: [PATCH -next] trusted-keys: Fix kernel-doc warnings in trusted-keys

[Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>]

On Thu, Aug 3, 2023 at 6:21 PM Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2023-08-03 at 18:00 -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 4:49 PM Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 9:33 AM Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 3:46 AM Gaosheng Cui <cuigaosheng1@huawei.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Fix kernel-doc warnings in trusted-keys:
> > > > >
> > > > > security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tpm2.c:203: warning: expecting
> > > > > prototype for tpm_buf_append_auth(). Prototype was for
> > > > > tpm2_buf_append_auth() instead.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Gaosheng Cui <cuigaosheng1@huawei.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tpm2.c | 2 +-
> > > > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > Reviewed-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
> > >
> > > Jarkko, David, can one of you pick this up into your tree?
> >
> > Guys, this patch is both trivial and obviously correct, please pick it
> > up so it can go up during the next merge window.
>
> Paul, either Jarkko or I can queue a trusted-keys patch.  As this isn't
> on the top of Jarkko's radar, I'll queue it.

Ah ha!  I was working under the assumption that everything under
security/keys/ was David and Jarko's responsibility, but now that I'm
looking at MAINTAINERS I see that isn't the case.  In fact it looks
like there are five (!) different "subsystems" under security/keys/
... I don't currently know enough about the different divisions there,
but it seems like we might want to see if we can do some consolidation
...

Anyway, thanks for picking this up Mimi.

-- 
paul-moore.com