From: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
To: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>, wufan@linux.microsoft.com
Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
ast@kernel.org, casey@schaufler-ca.com, andrii@kernel.org,
keescook@chromium.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, renauld@google.com,
revest@chromium.org, song@kernel.org, linux@roeck-us.net,
Kui-Feng Lee <sinquersw@gmail.com>,
John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 3/4] lsm: count the LSMs enabled at compile time
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 12:27:24 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHC9VhTjasfP3YMP8xD1jgaY8KFsZuzRCzeVMK73DTxm538x_w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240816154307.3031838-4-kpsingh@kernel.org>
On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 11:43 AM KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> These macros are a clever trick to determine a count of the number of
> LSMs that are enabled in the config to ascertain the maximum number of
> static calls that need to be configured per LSM hook.
>
> Without this one would need to generate static calls for the total
> number of LSMs in the kernel (even if they are not compiled) times the
> number of LSM hooks which ends up being quite wasteful.
>
> Suggested-by: Kui-Feng Lee <sinquersw@gmail.com>
> Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
> Acked-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
> Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
> Reviewed-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
> [PM: subj tweaks]
> Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
> ---
> include/linux/args.h | 6 +-
> include/linux/lsm_count.h | 128 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 131 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 include/linux/lsm_count.h
...
> diff --git a/include/linux/lsm_count.h b/include/linux/lsm_count.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..73c7cc81349b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/linux/lsm_count.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@
...
> +/*
> + * There is a trailing comma that we need to be accounted for. This is done by
> + * using a skipped argument in __COUNT_LSMS
> + */
> +#define __COUNT_LSMS(skipped_arg, args...) COUNT_ARGS(args...)
> +#define COUNT_LSMS(args...) __COUNT_LSMS(args)
> +
> +#define MAX_LSM_COUNT \
> + COUNT_LSMS( \
> + CAPABILITIES_ENABLED \
> + SELINUX_ENABLED \
> + SMACK_ENABLED \
> + APPARMOR_ENABLED \
> + TOMOYO_ENABLED \
> + YAMA_ENABLED \
> + LOADPIN_ENABLED \
> + LOCKDOWN_ENABLED \
> + SAFESETID_ENABLED \
> + BPF_LSM_ENABLED \
> + LANDLOCK_ENABLED \
> + IMA_ENABLED \
> + EVM_ENABLED)
The above is missing an entry for IPE; I missed this during the merge,
thanks to Fan for pointing it out. As the IPE patchset was merged
into the lsm/dev tree only a few hours before this patchset, that
isn't your fault, it's mine :)
Regardless, it should be fixed in lsm/dev now.
--
paul-moore.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-22 16:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-16 15:43 [PATCH v15 0/4] Reduce overhead of LSMs with static calls KP Singh
2024-08-16 15:43 ` [PATCH v15 1/4] init/main.c: Initialize early LSMs after arch code, static keys and calls KP Singh
2024-08-16 15:43 ` [PATCH v15 2/4] kernel: Add helper macros for loop unrolling KP Singh
2024-08-16 15:43 ` [PATCH v15 3/4] lsm: count the LSMs enabled at compile time KP Singh
2024-08-20 4:39 ` Paul Moore
2024-08-22 16:27 ` Paul Moore [this message]
2024-08-16 15:43 ` [PATCH v15 4/4] lsm: replace indirect LSM hook calls with static calls KP Singh
2024-08-16 21:30 ` [PATCH v15 0/4] Reduce overhead of LSMs " Guenter Roeck
2024-08-20 4:33 ` Paul Moore
2024-08-18 4:37 ` Tetsuo Handa
2024-08-20 5:17 ` Paul Moore
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAHC9VhTjasfP3YMP8xD1jgaY8KFsZuzRCzeVMK73DTxm538x_w@mail.gmail.com \
--to=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=renauld@google.com \
--cc=revest@chromium.org \
--cc=sinquersw@gmail.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=wufan@linux.microsoft.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).