From: luto@amacapital.net (Andy Lutomirski)
To: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH RFC 1/4] proc: add proc_fs_info struct to store proc options
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 12:10:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALCETrUG2Smb-+SWKphnB_oMFakZn9AuJDa7WeahnN9hBoENTQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1490887379-25880-2-git-send-email-tixxdz@gmail.com>
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 8:22 AM, Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is a preparation patch that adds a proc_fs_info to be able to store
> different procfs options. Right now some mount options are stored inside
> the pid namespace which make multiple proc share the same mount options.
> This patch will help also to fix this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@gmail.com>
> static struct dentry *proc_mount(struct file_system_type *fs_type,
> int flags, const char *dev_name, void *data)
> {
> + int error;
> + struct super_block *sb;
> struct pid_namespace *ns;
> + struct proc_fs_info *fs_info;
> +
> + if (!(flags & MS_KERNMOUNT) && !ns_capable(current_user_ns(), CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
> + return ERR_PTR(-EPERM);
Why is this check needed?
> diff --git a/include/linux/proc_fs.h b/include/linux/proc_fs.h
> index 2d2bf59..e1cb9c3 100644
> --- a/include/linux/proc_fs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/proc_fs.h
> @@ -6,11 +6,27 @@
>
> #include <linux/types.h>
> #include <linux/fs.h>
> +#include <linux/refcount.h>
> +
> +enum {
> + PROC_FS_V1 = 1,
> + PROC_FS_V2 = 2,
> +};
> +
> +struct proc_fs_info {
> + refcount_t users;
> + struct pid_namespace *pid_ns;
> + kgid_t pid_gid;
> + int hide_pid;
> + int version;
> +};
What is version?
Should this patch have just users and pid_ns and move the other stuff
to patch 2?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-30 19:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-30 15:22 [PATCH RFC 0/4] proc: support multiple separate proc instances per pidnamespace Djalal Harouni
2017-03-30 15:22 ` [PATCH RFC 1/4] proc: add proc_fs_info struct to store proc options Djalal Harouni
2017-03-30 19:10 ` Andy Lutomirski [this message]
2017-03-31 10:49 ` Djalal Harouni
2017-03-30 15:22 ` [PATCH RFC 2/4] proc: add helpers to set/get hidepid and gid mount options Djalal Harouni
2017-03-30 15:22 ` [PATCH RFC 3/4] proc: support mounting new procfs instances inside same pid namespace Djalal Harouni
2017-03-30 19:10 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-03-30 15:22 ` [PATCH RFC 4/4] proc: support flushing dcache entries of a task on multiple procfs mounts Djalal Harouni
2017-03-30 19:12 ` [PATCH RFC 0/4] proc: support multiple separate proc instances per pidnamespace Andy Lutomirski
2017-03-31 11:45 ` Djalal Harouni
2017-03-30 22:16 ` Alexey Gladkov
2017-03-31 11:26 ` Djalal Harouni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CALCETrUG2Smb-+SWKphnB_oMFakZn9AuJDa7WeahnN9hBoENTQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).