From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sargun@sargun.me (Sargun Dhillon) Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2018 21:21:41 -0700 Subject: [PATCH v5 1/1] security: Add mechanism to safely (un)load LSMs after boot time In-Reply-To: <201804090338.w393crfv005435@www262.sakura.ne.jp> References: <20180408065916.GA2832@ircssh-2.c.rugged-nimbus-611.internal> <201804090338.w393crfv005435@www262.sakura.ne.jp> Message-ID: To: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-security-module.vger.kernel.org On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 8:38 PM, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > Suggested changes on top of your patch: > > Replace "struct hlist_head *head" in "struct security_hook_list" with > "const unsigned int offset" because there is no need to initialize with > address of the immutable/mutable chains. > > Remove LSM_HOOK_INIT_MUTABLE() by embedding just offset (in bytes) from > head of "struct security_hook_heads" into "struct security_hook_list"->offset. > > Make "struct security_hook_heads security_hook_heads" and > "struct security_hook_heads security_hook_heads_mutable" local variables. > > Rename "struct security_hook_heads security_hook_heads" to > "struct security_hook_heads security_mutable_hook_heads" and mark it as > __ro_after_init. > > Add the fourth argument to security_add_hooks() which specifies to which > chain (security_{mutable|immutable}_hook_heads) to connect. > > Make all built-in LSM modules (except SELinux if > CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_DISABLE=y) be connected to > security_immutable_hook_heads. > > Rename __lsm_ro_after_init to __selinux_ro_after_init which is local to > SELinux. > > Mark "struct security_hook_list"->hook const because it won't change. > > Mark "struct security_hook_list"->lsm const because none of > security_add_hooks() callers are ready to modify the third argument. > > Remove SECURITY_HOOK_COUNT and "struct security_hook_list"->owner and > the exception in randomize_layout_plugin.c because preventing module > unloading won't work as expected. > Rather than completely removing the unloading code, might it make sense to add a BUG_ON or WARN_ON, in security_delete_hooks if allow_unload_module is false, and owner is not NULL? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html