From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC5B550297; Fri, 3 May 2024 23:45:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1714779915; cv=none; b=oSTMq9GG4h37BMi1NRTULlqt77jTZBITzTPmFXc8x33/Zw7J6WOVFpiWstHD2srIBan/GKY3tnnROY/Oj5oCuZHP5Yhjn2OeVOMlI7YneNZKpz44W+Cjim0jVB/3moRS0PI4DhcA+9D+B2ImwJNeLNdrrgrwwiF1e4y0Nuvlqiw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1714779915; c=relaxed/simple; bh=DlRlFVsHUqhvPdkfip9DnPPB8Y/bNEuxfZL0IMIFLYk=; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Cc:Subject:From:To: References:In-Reply-To; b=IK2dpdmna/eH20gp4kR7W/eFBiJlHaCnkgIzOhkq+NmzuTz2HPTNTkm++MB85lh9SE6dVoaQ+TIPCOMegadBRVf1VdzgpVIhodFR5/+Kf2synHhoTG6jegBj7VIzNVlD3DVpGkivinLfytkJweWMPI0XtN5sfv3TtsKSLQR5s/8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=BZoQANMu; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="BZoQANMu" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EF2F4C116B1; Fri, 3 May 2024 23:45:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1714779915; bh=DlRlFVsHUqhvPdkfip9DnPPB8Y/bNEuxfZL0IMIFLYk=; h=Date:Cc:Subject:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=BZoQANMu5xxuHXX714j4tlKziMZOQFhvYDjQLmlnL6HneFF17oZkflc23OPLrUjm6 l96OiS8KxIKEs5kczliHGVnsn10tT68fYsWkcfAYPWXZ1XvmzGoHvUkp1ZxmKrWpDC s7td0SjDAOIEg2AzAYplNdCnrGMHYph1oVDt7Xqi8J5CfL0NaerWmmjCQ7oBTxZkFN hi9mYVwSgjD715rrjl4RTDFa7RFivlIKP+ftuX65ggz1X4tvvvHVoGTWJAtpHvh7Rc WVqUjjU2Mp8QltWKiPa2PEtJQ3MsGF6I9PdUxd++kH3e/soRIgYBMoF7CMkgpxB3MJ 71FCga1RH5W5w== Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Sat, 04 May 2024 02:45:05 +0300 Message-Id: Cc: "Mimi Zohar" , "James Bottomley" , "Herbert Xu" , "David S. Miller" , "Kshitiz Varshney" , "Shawn Guo" , "Jonathan Corbet" , "Sascha Hauer" , "kernel@pengutronix.de" , "Fabio Estevam" , "dl-linux-imx" , "Ahmad Fatoum" , "sigma star Kernel Team" , "David Howells" , "Li Yang" , "Paul Moore" , "James Morris" , "Serge E. Hallyn" , "Paul E. McKenney" , "Randy Dunlap" , "Catalin Marinas" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "Tejun Heo" , "Steven Rostedt (Google)" , "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org" , "keyrings@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" , "linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org" , "Richard Weinberger" , "David Oberhollenzer" , "Varun Sethi" , "Gaurav Jain" , "Pankaj Gupta" Subject: Re: [EXT] [PATCH v8 6/6] docs: trusted-encrypted: add DCP as new trust source From: "Jarkko Sakkinen" To: "David Gstir" X-Mailer: aerc 0.17.0 References: <20240403072131.54935-1-david@sigma-star.at> <20240403072131.54935-7-david@sigma-star.at> <7783BAE9-87DA-4DD5-ADFA-15A9B55EEF39@sigma-star.at> In-Reply-To: On Tue Apr 30, 2024 at 3:03 PM EEST, David Gstir wrote: > Hi Jarkko, > > > On 30.04.2024, at 13:48, Kshitiz Varshney wr= ote: > >=20 > > Hi David, > >=20 > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: David Gstir > >> Sent: Monday, April 29, 2024 5:05 PM > >> To: Kshitiz Varshney > > > >>=20 > >> Did you get around to testing this? > >> I=E2=80=99d greatly appreciate a Tested-by for this. :-) > >>=20 > >> Thanks! > >> BR, David > >=20 > > Currently, I am bit busy with other priority activities. It will take t= ime to test this patch set. > > How should we proceed here? > Do we have to miss another release cycle, because of a Tested-by? > > If any bugs pop up I=E2=80=99ll happily fix them, but at the moment it ap= pears to be more of a formality. > IMHO the patch set itself is rather small and has been thoroughly reviewe= d to ensure that any huge > issues would already have been caught by now. I don't mind picking this actually since unless you consume it, it should not get in the way. I'll pick it during the weekend. Thanks for reminding. BR, Jarkko