From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 930671B960; Thu, 4 Jul 2024 06:52:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1720075942; cv=none; b=uMGF9D8mrd8ibv4D6ZUCpHvijqAMl/5obn+O714KfOc+yVFSP97cmWfJY1ZwuBzXM4iY36bZ9pdNY8ON0nchurk2+YCgcBrS0BT/m+LIfnypxHqlJ51wumUYHXzqOxsgm8UzdKNORBOCXK+8Mdmk7c23/3o6+9wztCXgBUjmcW4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1720075942; c=relaxed/simple; bh=AbbkD8QGrQK5+Az2vQlPRB5MMIbzZidfDuhnrw52HQ8=; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Cc:Subject:From:To: References:In-Reply-To; b=HH1p4c9LvCRcQYhRMl/I6PE3ag7jh4YxtB4J8Rs7NoOlApr3I2YUDvX5zvSROloGs7lLrfeHDc95CFNWyH/0VdiFxKajT4TQN5psrkyVcV1yIQRpdVS03jL5qMqDgkmZD1sMmfBXYDOGiaXTZ137+PWPO++qmc/9tbNZ2lxMPhQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=DHtHFFRg; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="DHtHFFRg" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7D882C3277B; Thu, 4 Jul 2024 06:52:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1720075942; bh=AbbkD8QGrQK5+Az2vQlPRB5MMIbzZidfDuhnrw52HQ8=; h=Date:Cc:Subject:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=DHtHFFRgVSbONvqa5SX+U5QoIdZYjOsOvo44/G3l3tm36zbOYLH8iFbyZbC/hhSWV fcJDKapQrGY2L5Siq+TohbYZ1Cd7bcyfPt6n+paqi5TAIBtVUSSGRLAhs9HMWhBQwc AOXFYZeY8iWMIAonS3vqvfIyUHWSwi5ek5oVkbe1kn/2OL1/FNRIS2wzKO1tToOZjn C2rhogX3ubVLVqBiu/YbT8dBpgsYmqvrPXpVrUzCttq/l11tySFVf4SqeV0of6+wn0 p27oRoQgU5pgjv48CIgudoGqMaZLtg7dBw1VeVEIj/WECfhU08ytjcNpy6zTbnfWJc VY8gwkCROvc2Q== Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2024 09:52:16 +0300 Message-Id: Cc: "Thorsten Leemhuis" , "Linus Torvalds" , , "Peter Huewe" , "Jason Gunthorpe" , "James Bottomley" , "Mimi Zohar" , "David Howells" , "Paul Moore" , "James Morris" , "Serge E. Hallyn" , "Ard Biesheuvel" , "Mario Limonciello" , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] tpm: Address !chip->auth in tpm_buf_append_hmac_session*() From: "Jarkko Sakkinen" To: "Stefan Berger" , X-Mailer: aerc 0.17.0 References: <20240703182453.1580888-1-jarkko@kernel.org> <20240703182453.1580888-4-jarkko@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: On Thu Jul 4, 2024 at 4:56 AM EEST, Stefan Berger wrote: > [ 1.449673] tpm_ibmvtpm 5000: CRQ initialized > [ 1.449726] tpm_ibmvtpm 5000: CRQ initialization completed > [ 2.483218] tpm tpm0: auth session is not active This expected result and the driver should work as expected. And it correctly reports that auth session is not active. The reported error was exactly the TPM errors, which I guess do not happen anymore. Reported-by counts as much as reporting the symptom you are having, i.e. very different from something more "suggestive". Does that count as tested-by or not? BR, Jarkko