linux-security-module.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
To: "Thomas Weißschuh" <linux@weissschuh.net>
Cc: "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>,
	"David Howells" <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	"David Woodhouse" <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	"Eric Snowberg" <eric.snowberg@oracle.com>,
	keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Mark Pearson" <markpearson@lenovo.com>,
	linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] certs: log hash value on blacklist error
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2022 03:11:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y4QK2cmptp4vpRj/@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221118040343.2958-2-linux@weissschuh.net>

"Make blacklisted hash available in klog"

On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 05:03:41AM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> Without this information these logs are not actionable.

Without blacklisted hash?

> For example on duplicate blacklisted hashes reported by the system
> firmware users should be able to report the erroneous hashes to their
> system vendors.
> 
> While we are at it use the dedicated format string for ERR_PTR.

Lacks the beef so saying "while we are at it" makes no sense.

> Fixes: 6364d106e041 ("certs: Allow root user to append signed hashes to the blacklist keyring")

Why does this count as a bug?

> Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
> ---
>  certs/blacklist.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/certs/blacklist.c b/certs/blacklist.c
> index 41f10601cc72..6e260c4b6a19 100644
> --- a/certs/blacklist.c
> +++ b/certs/blacklist.c
> @@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ static int mark_raw_hash_blacklisted(const char *hash)
>  				   KEY_ALLOC_NOT_IN_QUOTA |
>  				   KEY_ALLOC_BUILT_IN);
>  	if (IS_ERR(key)) {
> -		pr_err("Problem blacklisting hash (%ld)\n", PTR_ERR(key));
> +		pr_err("Problem blacklisting hash %s: %pe\n", hash, key);
>  		return PTR_ERR(key);
>  	}
>  	return 0;
> -- 
> 2.38.1
> 

BR, Jarkko

  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-28  1:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-18  4:03 [PATCH v3 0/3] certs: Prevent spurious errors on repeated blacklisting Thomas Weißschuh
2022-11-18  4:03 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] certs: log hash value on blacklist error Thomas Weißschuh
2022-11-28  1:11   ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2022-11-28  1:59     ` Thomas Weißschuh
2022-12-04 16:53       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-11-18  4:03 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] KEYS: Add key_create() Thomas Weißschuh
2022-11-28  1:12   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-11-18  4:03 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] certs: don't try to update blacklist keys Thomas Weißschuh
2022-12-12 12:29 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] certs: Prevent spurious errors on repeated blacklisting Paul Menzel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y4QK2cmptp4vpRj/@kernel.org \
    --to=jarkko@kernel.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=eric.snowberg@oracle.com \
    --cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@weissschuh.net \
    --cc=markpearson@lenovo.com \
    --cc=mic@digikod.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).