* [v5.19.y PATCH 0/3] Backport the io_uring/LSM CMD passthrough controls
@ 2022-09-06 21:03 Paul Moore
2022-09-06 21:03 ` [v5.19.y PATCH 1/3] lsm,io_uring: add LSM hooks for the new uring_cmd file op Paul Moore
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Paul Moore @ 2022-09-06 21:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: stable
Cc: Jens Axboe, Luis Chamberlain, Casey Schaufler, selinux,
linux-security-module
The stable patch merging tools failed to automatically merge the
io_uring/LSM CMD passthrough controls into the stable v5.19.y branch,
so I'm doing the backport manually and submitting them directly to
stable for the next v5.19.y release. The backport is necessary due
to the reorg/decomposition of the io_uring code in io_uring/ during
the v5.19->v6.0 merge window. Other than the differences in the
filenames under io_uring, the code changes are pretty much the same.
I've done some basic sanity testing this afternoon with these
patches and everything looks good to me.
If you would prefer to pull these directly from a git tree instead
of email, they are available via the LSM tree on the stable-5.19
branch, using the lsm-pr-20220906 tag.
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pcmoore/lsm.git
lsm-pr-20220906
---
Paul Moore (3):
lsm,io_uring: add LSM hooks for the new uring_cmd file op
selinux: implement the security_uring_cmd() LSM hook
Smack: Provide read control for io_uring_cmd
include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h | 1 +
include/linux/lsm_hooks.h | 3 +++
include/linux/security.h | 5 +++++
io_uring/io_uring.c | 4 ++++
security/security.c | 4 ++++
security/selinux/hooks.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++
security/selinux/include/classmap.h | 2 +-
security/smack/smack_lsm.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
8 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [v5.19.y PATCH 1/3] lsm,io_uring: add LSM hooks for the new uring_cmd file op
2022-09-06 21:03 [v5.19.y PATCH 0/3] Backport the io_uring/LSM CMD passthrough controls Paul Moore
@ 2022-09-06 21:03 ` Paul Moore
2022-09-06 21:03 ` [v5.19.y PATCH 2/3] selinux: implement the security_uring_cmd() LSM hook Paul Moore
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Paul Moore @ 2022-09-06 21:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: stable
Cc: Jens Axboe, Luis Chamberlain, Casey Schaufler, selinux,
linux-security-module
Backport the following upstream commit into Linux v5.19.y:
commit 2a5840124009f133bd09fd855963551fb2cefe22
Author: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Date: Fri Jul 15 12:16:22 2022 -0700
lsm,io_uring: add LSM hooks for the new uring_cmd file op
io-uring cmd support was added through ee692a21e9bf ("fs,io_uring:
add infrastructure for uring-cmd"), this extended the struct
file_operations to allow a new command which each subsystem can use
to enable command passthrough. Add an LSM specific for the command
passthrough which enables LSMs to inspect the command details.
This was discussed long ago without no clear pointer for something
conclusive, so this enables LSMs to at least reject this new file
operation.
[0] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/8adf55db-7bab-f59d-d612-ed906b948d19@schaufler-ca.com
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
---
include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h | 1 +
include/linux/lsm_hooks.h | 3 +++
include/linux/security.h | 5 +++++
io_uring/io_uring.c | 4 ++++
security/security.c | 4 ++++
5 files changed, 17 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h b/include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h
index eafa1d2489fd..4e94755098f1 100644
--- a/include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h
+++ b/include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h
@@ -406,4 +406,5 @@ LSM_HOOK(int, 0, perf_event_write, struct perf_event *event)
#ifdef CONFIG_IO_URING
LSM_HOOK(int, 0, uring_override_creds, const struct cred *new)
LSM_HOOK(int, 0, uring_sqpoll, void)
+LSM_HOOK(int, 0, uring_cmd, struct io_uring_cmd *ioucmd)
#endif /* CONFIG_IO_URING */
diff --git a/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h b/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
index 91c8146649f5..b681cfce6190 100644
--- a/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
+++ b/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
@@ -1575,6 +1575,9 @@
* Check whether the current task is allowed to spawn a io_uring polling
* thread (IORING_SETUP_SQPOLL).
*
+ * @uring_cmd:
+ * Check whether the file_operations uring_cmd is allowed to run.
+ *
*/
union security_list_options {
#define LSM_HOOK(RET, DEFAULT, NAME, ...) RET (*NAME)(__VA_ARGS__);
diff --git a/include/linux/security.h b/include/linux/security.h
index 7fc4e9f49f54..3cc127bb5bfd 100644
--- a/include/linux/security.h
+++ b/include/linux/security.h
@@ -2051,6 +2051,7 @@ static inline int security_perf_event_write(struct perf_event *event)
#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY
extern int security_uring_override_creds(const struct cred *new);
extern int security_uring_sqpoll(void);
+extern int security_uring_cmd(struct io_uring_cmd *ioucmd);
#else
static inline int security_uring_override_creds(const struct cred *new)
{
@@ -2060,6 +2061,10 @@ static inline int security_uring_sqpoll(void)
{
return 0;
}
+static inline int security_uring_cmd(struct io_uring_cmd *ioucmd)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
#endif /* CONFIG_SECURITY */
#endif /* CONFIG_IO_URING */
diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.c b/io_uring/io_uring.c
index cd155b7e1346..c5208dca18fa 100644
--- a/io_uring/io_uring.c
+++ b/io_uring/io_uring.c
@@ -4878,6 +4878,10 @@ static int io_uring_cmd(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
if (!req->file->f_op->uring_cmd)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ ret = security_uring_cmd(ioucmd);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
if (ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_SQE128)
issue_flags |= IO_URING_F_SQE128;
if (ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_CQE32)
diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
index 188b8f782220..8b62654ff3f9 100644
--- a/security/security.c
+++ b/security/security.c
@@ -2654,4 +2654,8 @@ int security_uring_sqpoll(void)
{
return call_int_hook(uring_sqpoll, 0);
}
+int security_uring_cmd(struct io_uring_cmd *ioucmd)
+{
+ return call_int_hook(uring_cmd, 0, ioucmd);
+}
#endif /* CONFIG_IO_URING */
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [v5.19.y PATCH 2/3] selinux: implement the security_uring_cmd() LSM hook
2022-09-06 21:03 [v5.19.y PATCH 0/3] Backport the io_uring/LSM CMD passthrough controls Paul Moore
2022-09-06 21:03 ` [v5.19.y PATCH 1/3] lsm,io_uring: add LSM hooks for the new uring_cmd file op Paul Moore
@ 2022-09-06 21:03 ` Paul Moore
2022-09-06 21:03 ` [v5.19.y PATCH 3/3] Smack: Provide read control for io_uring_cmd Paul Moore
2022-09-11 11:36 ` [v5.19.y PATCH 0/3] Backport the io_uring/LSM CMD passthrough controls Greg KH
3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Paul Moore @ 2022-09-06 21:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: stable
Cc: Jens Axboe, Luis Chamberlain, Casey Schaufler, selinux,
linux-security-module
Backport the following upstream commit into Linux v5.19.y:
commit f4d653dcaa4e4056e1630423e6a8ece4869b544f
Author: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Date: Wed Aug 10 15:55:36 2022 -0400
selinux: implement the security_uring_cmd() LSM hook
Add a SELinux access control for the iouring IORING_OP_URING_CMD
command. This includes the addition of a new permission in the
existing "io_uring" object class: "cmd". The subject of the new
permission check is the domain of the process requesting access, the
object is the open file which points to the device/file that is the
target of the IORING_OP_URING_CMD operation. A sample policy rule
is shown below:
allow <domain> <file>:io_uring { cmd };
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
---
security/selinux/hooks.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
security/selinux/include/classmap.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/security/selinux/hooks.c b/security/selinux/hooks.c
index 1bbd53321d13..e90dfa36f79a 100644
--- a/security/selinux/hooks.c
+++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c
@@ -91,6 +91,7 @@
#include <uapi/linux/mount.h>
#include <linux/fsnotify.h>
#include <linux/fanotify.h>
+#include <linux/io_uring.h>
#include "avc.h"
#include "objsec.h"
@@ -6990,6 +6991,28 @@ static int selinux_uring_sqpoll(void)
return avc_has_perm(&selinux_state, sid, sid,
SECCLASS_IO_URING, IO_URING__SQPOLL, NULL);
}
+
+/**
+ * selinux_uring_cmd - check if IORING_OP_URING_CMD is allowed
+ * @ioucmd: the io_uring command structure
+ *
+ * Check to see if the current domain is allowed to execute an
+ * IORING_OP_URING_CMD against the device/file specified in @ioucmd.
+ *
+ */
+static int selinux_uring_cmd(struct io_uring_cmd *ioucmd)
+{
+ struct file *file = ioucmd->file;
+ struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
+ struct inode_security_struct *isec = selinux_inode(inode);
+ struct common_audit_data ad;
+
+ ad.type = LSM_AUDIT_DATA_FILE;
+ ad.u.file = file;
+
+ return avc_has_perm(&selinux_state, current_sid(), isec->sid,
+ SECCLASS_IO_URING, IO_URING__CMD, &ad);
+}
#endif /* CONFIG_IO_URING */
/*
@@ -7234,6 +7257,7 @@ static struct security_hook_list selinux_hooks[] __lsm_ro_after_init = {
#ifdef CONFIG_IO_URING
LSM_HOOK_INIT(uring_override_creds, selinux_uring_override_creds),
LSM_HOOK_INIT(uring_sqpoll, selinux_uring_sqpoll),
+ LSM_HOOK_INIT(uring_cmd, selinux_uring_cmd),
#endif
/*
diff --git a/security/selinux/include/classmap.h b/security/selinux/include/classmap.h
index ff757ae5f253..1c2f41ff4e55 100644
--- a/security/selinux/include/classmap.h
+++ b/security/selinux/include/classmap.h
@@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ const struct security_class_mapping secclass_map[] = {
{ "anon_inode",
{ COMMON_FILE_PERMS, NULL } },
{ "io_uring",
- { "override_creds", "sqpoll", NULL } },
+ { "override_creds", "sqpoll", "cmd", NULL } },
{ NULL }
};
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [v5.19.y PATCH 3/3] Smack: Provide read control for io_uring_cmd
2022-09-06 21:03 [v5.19.y PATCH 0/3] Backport the io_uring/LSM CMD passthrough controls Paul Moore
2022-09-06 21:03 ` [v5.19.y PATCH 1/3] lsm,io_uring: add LSM hooks for the new uring_cmd file op Paul Moore
2022-09-06 21:03 ` [v5.19.y PATCH 2/3] selinux: implement the security_uring_cmd() LSM hook Paul Moore
@ 2022-09-06 21:03 ` Paul Moore
2022-09-06 21:25 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-09-11 11:36 ` [v5.19.y PATCH 0/3] Backport the io_uring/LSM CMD passthrough controls Greg KH
3 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Paul Moore @ 2022-09-06 21:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: stable
Cc: Jens Axboe, Luis Chamberlain, Casey Schaufler, selinux,
linux-security-module
Backport the following upstream commit into Linux v5.19.y:
commit dd9373402280cf4715fdc8fd5070f7d039e43511
Author: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Date: Tue Aug 23 16:46:18 2022 -0700
Smack: Provide read control for io_uring_cmd
Limit io_uring "cmd" options to files for which the caller has
Smack read access. There may be cases where the cmd option may
be closer to a write access than a read, but there is no way
to make that determination.
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
---
security/smack/smack_lsm.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)
diff --git a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
index 6207762dbdb1..b30e20f64471 100644
--- a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
+++ b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
#include <linux/fs_context.h>
#include <linux/fs_parser.h>
#include <linux/watch_queue.h>
+#include <linux/io_uring.h>
#include "smack.h"
#define TRANS_TRUE "TRUE"
@@ -4739,6 +4740,36 @@ static int smack_uring_sqpoll(void)
return -EPERM;
}
+/**
+ * smack_uring_cmd - check on file operations for io_uring
+ * @ioucmd: the command in question
+ *
+ * Make a best guess about whether a io_uring "command" should
+ * be allowed. Use the same logic used for determining if the
+ * file could be opened for read in the absence of better criteria.
+ */
+static int smack_uring_cmd(struct io_uring_cmd *ioucmd)
+{
+ struct file *file = ioucmd->file;
+ struct smk_audit_info ad;
+ struct task_smack *tsp;
+ struct inode *inode;
+ int rc;
+
+ if (!file)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ tsp = smack_cred(file->f_cred);
+ inode = file_inode(file);
+
+ smk_ad_init(&ad, __func__, LSM_AUDIT_DATA_PATH);
+ smk_ad_setfield_u_fs_path(&ad, file->f_path);
+ rc = smk_tskacc(tsp, smk_of_inode(inode), MAY_READ, &ad);
+ rc = smk_bu_credfile(file->f_cred, file, MAY_READ, rc);
+
+ return rc;
+}
+
#endif /* CONFIG_IO_URING */
struct lsm_blob_sizes smack_blob_sizes __lsm_ro_after_init = {
@@ -4896,6 +4927,7 @@ static struct security_hook_list smack_hooks[] __lsm_ro_after_init = {
#ifdef CONFIG_IO_URING
LSM_HOOK_INIT(uring_override_creds, smack_uring_override_creds),
LSM_HOOK_INIT(uring_sqpoll, smack_uring_sqpoll),
+ LSM_HOOK_INIT(uring_cmd, smack_uring_cmd),
#endif
};
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [v5.19.y PATCH 3/3] Smack: Provide read control for io_uring_cmd
2022-09-06 21:03 ` [v5.19.y PATCH 3/3] Smack: Provide read control for io_uring_cmd Paul Moore
@ 2022-09-06 21:25 ` Casey Schaufler
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Casey Schaufler @ 2022-09-06 21:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul Moore, stable
Cc: Jens Axboe, Luis Chamberlain, selinux, linux-security-module
On 9/6/2022 2:03 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> Backport the following upstream commit into Linux v5.19.y:
>
> commit dd9373402280cf4715fdc8fd5070f7d039e43511
> Author: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
> Date: Tue Aug 23 16:46:18 2022 -0700
>
> Smack: Provide read control for io_uring_cmd
>
> Limit io_uring "cmd" options to files for which the caller has
> Smack read access. There may be cases where the cmd option may
> be closer to a write access than a read, but there is no way
> to make that determination.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Acked-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
> ---
> security/smack/smack_lsm.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
> index 6207762dbdb1..b30e20f64471 100644
> --- a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
> +++ b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
> @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
> #include <linux/fs_context.h>
> #include <linux/fs_parser.h>
> #include <linux/watch_queue.h>
> +#include <linux/io_uring.h>
> #include "smack.h"
>
> #define TRANS_TRUE "TRUE"
> @@ -4739,6 +4740,36 @@ static int smack_uring_sqpoll(void)
> return -EPERM;
> }
>
> +/**
> + * smack_uring_cmd - check on file operations for io_uring
> + * @ioucmd: the command in question
> + *
> + * Make a best guess about whether a io_uring "command" should
> + * be allowed. Use the same logic used for determining if the
> + * file could be opened for read in the absence of better criteria.
> + */
> +static int smack_uring_cmd(struct io_uring_cmd *ioucmd)
> +{
> + struct file *file = ioucmd->file;
> + struct smk_audit_info ad;
> + struct task_smack *tsp;
> + struct inode *inode;
> + int rc;
> +
> + if (!file)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + tsp = smack_cred(file->f_cred);
> + inode = file_inode(file);
> +
> + smk_ad_init(&ad, __func__, LSM_AUDIT_DATA_PATH);
> + smk_ad_setfield_u_fs_path(&ad, file->f_path);
> + rc = smk_tskacc(tsp, smk_of_inode(inode), MAY_READ, &ad);
> + rc = smk_bu_credfile(file->f_cred, file, MAY_READ, rc);
> +
> + return rc;
> +}
> +
> #endif /* CONFIG_IO_URING */
>
> struct lsm_blob_sizes smack_blob_sizes __lsm_ro_after_init = {
> @@ -4896,6 +4927,7 @@ static struct security_hook_list smack_hooks[] __lsm_ro_after_init = {
> #ifdef CONFIG_IO_URING
> LSM_HOOK_INIT(uring_override_creds, smack_uring_override_creds),
> LSM_HOOK_INIT(uring_sqpoll, smack_uring_sqpoll),
> + LSM_HOOK_INIT(uring_cmd, smack_uring_cmd),
> #endif
> };
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [v5.19.y PATCH 0/3] Backport the io_uring/LSM CMD passthrough controls
2022-09-06 21:03 [v5.19.y PATCH 0/3] Backport the io_uring/LSM CMD passthrough controls Paul Moore
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2022-09-06 21:03 ` [v5.19.y PATCH 3/3] Smack: Provide read control for io_uring_cmd Paul Moore
@ 2022-09-11 11:36 ` Greg KH
3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2022-09-11 11:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul Moore
Cc: stable, Jens Axboe, Luis Chamberlain, Casey Schaufler, selinux,
linux-security-module
On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 05:03:36PM -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
> The stable patch merging tools failed to automatically merge the
> io_uring/LSM CMD passthrough controls into the stable v5.19.y branch,
> so I'm doing the backport manually and submitting them directly to
> stable for the next v5.19.y release. The backport is necessary due
> to the reorg/decomposition of the io_uring code in io_uring/ during
> the v5.19->v6.0 merge window. Other than the differences in the
> filenames under io_uring, the code changes are pretty much the same.
>
> I've done some basic sanity testing this afternoon with these
> patches and everything looks good to me.
>
> If you would prefer to pull these directly from a git tree instead
> of email, they are available via the LSM tree on the stable-5.19
> branch, using the lsm-pr-20220906 tag.
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pcmoore/lsm.git
> lsm-pr-20220906
>
Now queued up, thanks. Note, you dropped the original signed-off-by of
the original commits, which I had to add back by hand :(
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-09-11 11:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-09-06 21:03 [v5.19.y PATCH 0/3] Backport the io_uring/LSM CMD passthrough controls Paul Moore
2022-09-06 21:03 ` [v5.19.y PATCH 1/3] lsm,io_uring: add LSM hooks for the new uring_cmd file op Paul Moore
2022-09-06 21:03 ` [v5.19.y PATCH 2/3] selinux: implement the security_uring_cmd() LSM hook Paul Moore
2022-09-06 21:03 ` [v5.19.y PATCH 3/3] Smack: Provide read control for io_uring_cmd Paul Moore
2022-09-06 21:25 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-09-11 11:36 ` [v5.19.y PATCH 0/3] Backport the io_uring/LSM CMD passthrough controls Greg KH
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).