linux-security-module.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Günther Noack" <gnoack@google.com>
To: Mikhail Ivanov <ivanov.mikhail1@huawei-partners.com>
Cc: mic@digikod.net, willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com,
	gnoack3000@gmail.com,  linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org,  netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
	yusongping@huawei.com,  artem.kuzin@huawei.com,
	konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 19/19] landlock: Document socket rule type support
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2024 18:21:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zv7EbY2v6aElb5BI@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <db38b163-ceb9-c74b-bcd5-402c646abea7@huawei-partners.com>

On Thu, Oct 03, 2024 at 05:00:14PM +0300, Mikhail Ivanov wrote:
> On 10/1/2024 10:09 AM, Günther Noack wrote:
> > IMHO, the length of the "Defining and enforcing a security policy" section is
> > slowly getting out of hand.  This was easier to follow when it was only file
> > system rules. -- I wonder whether we should split this up in subsections for the
> > individual steps to give this a more logical outline, e.g.
> > 
> > * Creating a ruleset
> > * Adding rules to the ruleset
> >    * Adding a file system rule
> >    * Adding a network rule
> >    * Adding a socket rule
> > * Enforcing the ruleset
> 
> I agree, it's important to keep usage usage description as simple as it
> possible. Should I include related commit in current patchset?

Sure, sounds good to me. 👍

—Günther

  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-03 16:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-04 10:48 [RFC PATCH v3 00/19] Support socket access-control Mikhail Ivanov
2024-09-04 10:48 ` [RFC PATCH v3 01/19] landlock: " Mikhail Ivanov
2024-09-06 13:09   ` Günther Noack
2024-09-09  7:23     ` Mikhail Ivanov
2024-11-11 16:29   ` Mikhail Ivanov
2024-11-22 17:45     ` Günther Noack
2024-11-25 11:04       ` Mikhail Ivanov
2024-11-27 18:43         ` Mickaël Salaün
2024-11-28 12:01           ` Mikhail Ivanov
2024-11-28 20:52             ` Mickaël Salaün
2024-12-02 11:32               ` Mikhail Ivanov
2024-12-24 16:55                 ` Mikhail Ivanov
2025-01-10 11:12                   ` Günther Noack
2025-01-10 13:02                     ` Mikhail Ivanov
2025-01-10 16:27                       ` Günther Noack
2025-01-10 16:55                         ` Mikhail Ivanov
2025-01-14 18:31                           ` Mickaël Salaün
2025-01-24 12:28                             ` Mikhail Ivanov
2025-01-24 14:02                               ` Mickaël Salaün
2024-09-04 10:48 ` [RFC PATCH v3 02/19] landlock: Add hook on socket creation Mikhail Ivanov
2024-09-04 10:48 ` [RFC PATCH v3 03/19] selftests/landlock: Test basic socket restriction Mikhail Ivanov
2024-09-10  9:53   ` Günther Noack
2024-09-04 10:48 ` [RFC PATCH v3 04/19] selftests/landlock: Test adding a rule with each supported access Mikhail Ivanov
2024-09-10  9:53   ` Günther Noack
2024-09-04 10:48 ` [RFC PATCH v3 05/19] selftests/landlock: Test adding a rule for each unknown access Mikhail Ivanov
2024-09-10  9:53   ` Günther Noack
2024-09-04 10:48 ` [RFC PATCH v3 06/19] selftests/landlock: Test adding a rule for unhandled access Mikhail Ivanov
2024-09-10  9:22   ` Günther Noack
2024-09-11  8:19     ` Mikhail Ivanov
2024-09-13 15:04       ` Günther Noack
2024-09-13 16:15         ` Mikhail Ivanov
2024-09-04 10:48 ` [RFC PATCH v3 07/19] selftests/landlock: Test adding a rule for empty access Mikhail Ivanov
2024-09-18 12:42   ` Günther Noack
2024-09-18 13:03     ` Mikhail Ivanov
2024-09-04 10:48 ` [RFC PATCH v3 08/19] selftests/landlock: Test overlapped restriction Mikhail Ivanov
2024-09-18 12:42   ` Günther Noack
2024-09-04 10:48 ` [RFC PATCH v3 09/19] selftests/landlock: Test creating a ruleset with unknown access Mikhail Ivanov
2024-09-18 12:44   ` Günther Noack
2024-09-04 10:48 ` [RFC PATCH v3 10/19] selftests/landlock: Test adding a rule with family and type outside the range Mikhail Ivanov
2024-09-04 10:48 ` [RFC PATCH v3 11/19] selftests/landlock: Test unsupported protocol restriction Mikhail Ivanov
2024-09-18 12:54   ` Günther Noack
2024-09-18 13:36     ` Mikhail Ivanov
2024-09-04 10:48 ` [RFC PATCH v3 12/19] selftests/landlock: Test that kernel space sockets are not restricted Mikhail Ivanov
2024-09-04 12:45   ` Mikhail Ivanov
2024-09-18 13:00   ` Günther Noack
2024-09-19 10:53     ` Mikhail Ivanov
2024-09-04 10:48 ` [RFC PATCH v3 13/19] selftests/landlock: Test packet protocol alias Mikhail Ivanov
2024-09-18 13:33   ` Günther Noack
2024-09-18 14:01     ` Mikhail Ivanov
2024-09-04 10:48 ` [RFC PATCH v3 14/19] selftests/landlock: Test socketpair(2) restriction Mikhail Ivanov
2024-09-18 13:47   ` Günther Noack
2024-09-23 12:57     ` Mikhail Ivanov
2024-09-25 12:17       ` Mikhail Ivanov
2024-09-27  9:48       ` Günther Noack
2024-09-28 20:06         ` Günther Noack
2024-09-29 17:31           ` Mickaël Salaün
2024-10-03 17:27             ` Mikhail Ivanov
2024-09-04 10:48 ` [RFC PATCH v3 15/19] selftests/landlock: Test SCTP peeloff restriction Mikhail Ivanov
2024-09-27 14:35   ` Günther Noack
2024-10-03 12:15     ` Mikhail Ivanov
2024-09-04 10:48 ` [RFC PATCH v3 16/19] selftests/landlock: Test that accept(2) is not restricted Mikhail Ivanov
2024-09-27 14:53   ` Günther Noack
2024-10-03 12:41     ` Mikhail Ivanov
2024-09-04 10:48 ` [RFC PATCH v3 17/19] samples/landlock: Replace atoi() with strtoull() in populate_ruleset_net() Mikhail Ivanov
2024-09-27 15:12   ` Günther Noack
2024-10-03 12:59     ` Mikhail Ivanov
2024-09-04 10:48 ` [RFC PATCH v3 18/19] samples/landlock: Support socket protocol restrictions Mikhail Ivanov
2024-10-01  7:56   ` Günther Noack
2024-10-03 13:15     ` Mikhail Ivanov
2024-09-04 10:48 ` [RFC PATCH v3 19/19] landlock: Document socket rule type support Mikhail Ivanov
2024-10-01  7:09   ` Günther Noack
2024-10-03 14:00     ` Mikhail Ivanov
2024-10-03 16:21       ` Günther Noack [this message]
2025-04-22 17:19 ` [RFC PATCH v3 00/19] Support socket access-control Mickaël Salaün
2025-04-25 13:58   ` Günther Noack
2025-04-29 11:59     ` Mikhail Ivanov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Zv7EbY2v6aElb5BI@google.com \
    --to=gnoack@google.com \
    --cc=artem.kuzin@huawei.com \
    --cc=gnoack3000@gmail.com \
    --cc=ivanov.mikhail1@huawei-partners.com \
    --cc=konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mic@digikod.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=yusongping@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).