From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pg1-f201.google.com (mail-pg1-f201.google.com [209.85.215.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57C54287260 for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2025 23:07:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.215.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1753225658; cv=none; b=cXfTN0MFme9t5nthCltcTlvSLysqOXUtFk27CnsykNiOnLGewIfX7RI1MzXyoueSg9TqTYvgajp3+GIVfCmle70J3B1WZocDey06VeNIlNAzR28ogMh9qphrv5ph9aXbvMwGmRWldJfwIJ152dQMDfQNtOGJ19eJ7AD8RlUo1iM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1753225658; c=relaxed/simple; bh=i9Topy5p8+oRB1ybTn3eGTjAdmW4So/zy81PHcCSQws=; h=Date:In-Reply-To:Mime-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:From: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=h0FONT6Tf0guroLc43nXpFeS1/4n1j320UJc1uVgf0K0RYN57pZPqrg1gF3v/uDOEAuUy8RwLYLHa0cVQuQ5PVMZCueeqr4M34fm3mbCBsUfAhfABd8zFg7en3g/aBjP5Vm1Up31pXJWZeuyfpSXVTCtxjZp5YChmjckP6jefME= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=flex--seanjc.bounces.google.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b=3oBXBwjH; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.215.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=flex--seanjc.bounces.google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="3oBXBwjH" Received: by mail-pg1-f201.google.com with SMTP id 41be03b00d2f7-b3ba7659210so4417492a12.2 for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2025 16:07:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20230601; t=1753225656; x=1753830456; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=f+m6qI30JHvrm3ONaGCpQMi0L8lxI7PYDb1Mu/Pb3F4=; b=3oBXBwjHNB/20r0hYHUo9vZehvohDETqWCUjsCDEyL+kRBgH4IOWq6ZyqqnhLOvxXE Ol9d1WAShIZs29mgPsEl2AANInab5X7lTu38QVCnI+8gAdxo4BtQ/mbDzmJUL3PmlYzM 3tY29xS1MbB928GRSQSaDAABmfc7vxaAik5oQbM5dsiNMQx6tUZoSlJCusNNJzrsBpKR HiQFpV4DuZastDN6Fqywl1v5FIiC6zu2vbea3np75HcthenrRXt04v1+wDeFE6puqlXY S4lxz9g/X7uGpGABuuT003TMROQDqgCPxScrE+Q9JJBiFkWkUa4n4aboTYaNVQqSyNf3 I3ag== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1753225656; x=1753830456; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=f+m6qI30JHvrm3ONaGCpQMi0L8lxI7PYDb1Mu/Pb3F4=; b=EDQqz7oZR9SsUmMDceoUbdMAQEfKENHwZmP7MSGDOi2TjxK5wbVU3Yh8wIY2+kEIet fFfupto+Xzs+/N4kysDOIwnQBSbqhMwYEcVlsqzzwUqrcfValQY1haUdGe3ERNAHsH16 MF50K2dKtPQBnYvRKLWReMWAlZrwWhJ6c3rTzzMr+fFyngszo8E2cZ1awmymeN0ArbJ7 /Nuow3q9zYiIcCaXwdBbjfyErT+I2BRh1l1WiA5O3k/FnLWJgDuHC92A/BhZNhKD3ISg vdJf72iNUhGpYC1mBMT6reD9AFP9zag/FoNiqLslDY4C87zZrERyHKGc8N2ggR3YoaIn AwXQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCW69TlzUW8ZLcsCa3sTLTOBZ+0k6NH1bkf3M8hr6bRApyRwYFrSSapR8hTI/qQ44hjykMajbNDZFdR0q7HnGdgvt0FBeKM=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyTXrTvdf+62q4wVh9eiMPni7Mecfev4Qcx6xVLgGp6KAZMIOmq TvAO6G5Pd7IN5QVNNzH+goay2XhwAe2eUkaJicoWijFVHESLGqEF8hOilbTul7KKKNkkSosw+dT tVrinbQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFOb8KYXXobVAAvvjW+Fe1YbH8mwfp6V2E801ROWDybd0+20juthdBHS5x4qZEtLjQQN6CpBVqzr4M= X-Received: from pjuj4.prod.google.com ([2002:a17:90a:d004:b0:313:242b:1773]) (user=seanjc job=prod-delivery.src-stubby-dispatcher) by 2002:a17:90b:5647:b0:311:fc8b:31b5 with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-31e507abbc6mr1697551a91.14.1753225656408; Tue, 22 Jul 2025 16:07:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2025 16:07:34 -0700 In-Reply-To: <80a047e2-e0fb-40cd-bb88-cce05ca017ac@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20250713174339.13981-2-shivankg@amd.com> <80a047e2-e0fb-40cd-bb88-cce05ca017ac@redhat.com> Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH V9 0/7] Add NUMA mempolicy support for KVM guest-memfd From: Sean Christopherson To: David Hildenbrand Cc: Shivank Garg , vbabka@suse.cz, willy@infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, shuah@kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, brauner@kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, ackerleytng@google.com, paul@paul-moore.com, jmorris@namei.org, serge@hallyn.com, pvorel@suse.cz, bfoster@redhat.com, tabba@google.com, vannapurve@google.com, chao.gao@intel.com, bharata@amd.com, nikunj@amd.com, michael.day@amd.com, shdhiman@amd.com, yan.y.zhao@intel.com, Neeraj.Upadhyay@amd.com, thomas.lendacky@amd.com, michael.roth@amd.com, aik@amd.com, jgg@nvidia.com, kalyazin@amazon.com, peterx@redhat.com, jack@suse.cz, rppt@kernel.org, hch@infradead.org, cgzones@googlemail.com, ira.weiny@intel.com, rientjes@google.com, roypat@amazon.co.uk, ziy@nvidia.com, matthew.brost@intel.com, joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com, rakie.kim@sk.com, byungchul@sk.com, gourry@gourry.net, kent.overstreet@linux.dev, ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com, apopple@nvidia.com, chao.p.peng@intel.com, amit@infradead.org, ddutile@redhat.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com, ashish.kalra@amd.com, gshan@redhat.com, jgowans@amazon.com, pankaj.gupta@amd.com, papaluri@amd.com, yuzhao@google.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, quic_eberman@quicinc.com, aneeshkumar.kizhakeveetil@arm.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-coco@lists.linux.dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Tue, Jul 22, 2025, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 22.07.25 16:45, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 22, 2025, David Hildenbrand wrote: > > > Just to clarify: this is based on Fuad's stage 1 and should probably still be > > > tagged "RFC" until stage-1 is finally upstream. > > > > > > (I was hoping stage-1 would go upstream in 6.17, but I am not sure yet if that is > > > still feasible looking at the never-ending review) > > > > 6.17 is very doable. > > I like your optimism :) I'm not optimistic, just incompetent. I forgot what kernel we're on. **6.18** is very doable, 6.17 not so much.