From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Bala-Vignesh-Reddy <reddybalavignesh9979@gmail.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, shuah@kernel.org, mic@digikod.net,
gnoack@google.com, david@redhat.com, lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com,
Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, vbabka@suse.cz, rppt@kernel.org,
surenb@google.com, mhocko@suse.com, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
horms@kernel.org, skhan@linuxfoundation.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests: centralise maybe-unused definition in kselftest.h
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2025 09:21:24 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aKfGFB2MmkbA4BBC@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250821101159.2238-1-reddybalavignesh9979@gmail.com>
On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 03:41:59PM +0530, Bala-Vignesh-Reddy wrote:
> Several selftests subdirectories duplicated the define __maybe_unused,
> leading to redundant code. Moved to kselftest.h header and removed
> other definition.
>
> This addresses the duplication noted in the proc-pid-vm warning fix
>
> Suggested-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Link:https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250820143954.33d95635e504e94df01930d0@linux-foundation.org/
>
> Signed-off-by: Bala-Vignesh-Reddy <reddybalavignesh9979@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-22 1:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-21 10:11 [PATCH] selftests: centralise maybe-unused definition in kselftest.h Bala-Vignesh-Reddy
2025-08-21 14:46 ` Wei Yang
2025-08-21 16:56 ` SeongJae Park
2025-08-22 1:21 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2025-08-22 14:51 ` Mickaël Salaün
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aKfGFB2MmkbA4BBC@fedora \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gnoack@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mic@digikod.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=reddybalavignesh9979@gmail.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).