linux-security-module.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>
To: torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Ryan Foster <foster.ryan.r@gmail.com>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Subject: [GIT PULL] capabilities update for v6.19
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2025 18:27:22 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aTIm6grHZUhRncFH@mail.hallyn.com> (raw)

Hi Linus,

This contains the capabilities changes for 6.19.  There is only a single commit,

   Clarify the rootid_owns_currentns

which introduces no functional change.  Ryan Foster had sent a patch
to add testing of the security/commoncap.c:rootid_owns_currentns()
function.  The patch pointed out that this function was not as clear
as it should be.

This commit has two purposes:

1. Clarify the intent of the function in the name
2. Split the function so that the base functionality is easier
   to test from a kunit test.

This commit has been in linux-next since November 18 with no reported
issues.  Ryan has posted an updated test patch based on this commit.

The following changes since commit 211ddde0823f1442e4ad052a2f30f050145ccada:

  Linux 6.18-rc2 (2025-10-19 15:19:16 -1000)

are available in the Git repository at:

  https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sergeh/linux.git tags/caps-pr-20251204

for you to fetch changes up to 9891d2f79a9fe9b77ad290f950eb8fa3e375330e:

  Clarify the rootid_owns_currentns (2025-11-18 18:00:19 -0600)

----------------------------------------------------------------
Capabilities patch for v6.19

There is only a single commit,

   Clarify the rootid_owns_currentns

which introduces no functional change.  Ryan Foster had sent a patch
to add testing of the security/commoncap.c:rootid_owns_currentns()
function.  The patch pointed out that this function was not as clear
as it should be.

This commit has two purposes:

1. Clarify the intent of the function in the name
2. Split the function so that the base functionality is easier
   to test from a kunit test.

This commit has been in linux-next since November 18 with no reported
issues.  Ryan has posted an updated test patch based on this commit.

----------------------------------------------------------------
Serge Hallyn (1):
      Clarify the rootid_owns_currentns

 security/commoncap.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)


             reply	other threads:[~2025-12-05  0:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-05  0:27 Serge E. Hallyn [this message]
2025-12-05  1:20 ` [GIT PULL] capabilities update for v6.19 Linus Torvalds
2025-12-05  4:43   ` Serge E. Hallyn
2025-12-05 16:57     ` Linus Torvalds
2025-12-05  4:15 ` pr-tracker-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aTIm6grHZUhRncFH@mail.hallyn.com \
    --to=serge@hallyn.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=foster.ryan.r@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).