From: Frederick Lawler <fred@cloudflare.com>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>,
kernel-team@cloudflare.com
Subject: Re: xfs/ima: Regression caching i_version
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2025 15:12:45 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aTszzVJkIqBpYLst@CMGLRV3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2b193b5ccd696420196ae9059f83dcc8b3f06473.camel@kernel.org>
On Fri, Dec 12, 2025 at 05:55:45AM +0900, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Thu, 2025-12-11 at 14:29 -0600, Frederick Lawler wrote:
> > Hi Jeff,
> >
> > While testing 6.18, I think I found a regression with
> > commit 1cf7e834a6fb ("xfs: switch to multigrain timestamps") since 6.13
> > where IMA is no longer able to properly cache i_version when we overlay
> > tmpfs on top of XFS. Each measurement diff check in function
> > process_measurement() reports that the i_version is
> > always set to zero for iint->real_inode.version.
> >
> > The function ima_collect_measurement() is looking to extract the version
> > from the cookie on next measurement to cache i_version.
> >
> > I'm unclear from the commit description what the right approach here is:
> > update in IMA land by checking for time changes, or do
> > something else such as adding the cookie back.
> >
> >
>
> What we probably want to do is switch to using the ctime to manufacture
> a change attribute when STATX_CHANGE_ATTRIBUTE is not set in the statx
> reply.
>
> IIRC, IMA doesn't need to persist these values across reboot, so
> something like this (completely untested) might work, but it may be
> better to lift nfsd4_change_attribute() into a common header and use
> the same mechanism for both:
I agree lifting nfsd4_change_attribute(), if anything else, a consistent
place to fetch the i_version from. Am I correct in my understanding that
the XOR on the times will cancel out and result in just the i_version?
IMA is calling into inode_eq_iversion() to perform the comparison
between the cached value and inode.i_version.
>
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c
> index c35ea613c9f8..5a71845f579e 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c
> @@ -272,10 +272,14 @@ int ima_collect_measurement(struct ima_iint_cache *iint, struct file *file,
> * to an initial measurement/appraisal/audit, but was modified to
> * assume the file changed.
> */
> - result = vfs_getattr_nosec(&file->f_path, &stat, STATX_CHANGE_COOKIE,
> + result = vfs_getattr_nosec(&file->f_path, &stat, STATX_CHANGE_COOKIE | STATX_CTIME,
> AT_STATX_SYNC_AS_STAT);
> - if (!result && (stat.result_mask & STATX_CHANGE_COOKIE))
> - i_version = stat.change_cookie;
> + if (!result) {
> + if (stat.result_mask & STATX_CHANGE_COOKIE)
> + i_version = stat.change_cookie;
> + else if (stat.result_mask & STATX_CTIME)
> + i_version = stat.ctime.tv_sec ^ stat.ctime.tv_nsec;
> + }
> hash.hdr.algo = algo;
> hash.hdr.length = hash_digest_size[algo];
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-11 21:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-11 20:29 xfs/ima: Regression caching i_version Frederick Lawler
2025-12-11 20:55 ` Jeff Layton
2025-12-11 21:12 ` Frederick Lawler [this message]
2025-12-11 21:41 ` Jeff Layton
2025-12-11 22:29 ` Frederick Lawler
2025-12-11 22:50 ` Jeff Layton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aTszzVJkIqBpYLst@CMGLRV3 \
--to=fred@cloudflare.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=kernel-team@cloudflare.com \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).