From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
"open list:KEYS/KEYRINGS" <keyrings@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:SECURITY SUBSYSTEM"
<linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KEYS: trusted: Use get_random-fallback for TPM
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2025 22:35:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aUBxKqL5hFibwI3r@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251215200939.GA10539@google.com>
On Mon, Dec 15, 2025 at 08:09:39PM +0000, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2025 at 11:32:36PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > 1. tpm2_get_random() is costly when TCG_TPM2_HMAC is enabled and thus its
> > use should be pooled rather than directly used. This both reduces
> > latency and improves its predictability.
> >
> > 2. Linux is better off overall if every subsystem uses the same source for
> > the random bistream as the de-facto choice, unless *force majeure*
> > reasons point to some other direction.
> >
> > In the case, of TPM there is no reason for trusted keys to invoke TPM
> > directly.
> >
> > Thus, unset '.get_random', which causes fallback to kernel_get_random().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tpm1.c | 6 ------
> > 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tpm1.c b/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tpm1.c
> > index 636acb66a4f6..33b7739741c3 100644
> > --- a/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tpm1.c
> > +++ b/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tpm1.c
> > @@ -936,11 +936,6 @@ static int trusted_tpm_unseal(struct trusted_key_payload *p, char *datablob)
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > -static int trusted_tpm_get_random(unsigned char *key, size_t key_len)
> > -{
> > - return tpm_get_random(chip, key, key_len);
> > -}
> > -
> > static int __init init_digests(void)
> > {
> > int i;
> > @@ -992,6 +987,5 @@ struct trusted_key_ops trusted_key_tpm_ops = {
> > .init = trusted_tpm_init,
> > .seal = trusted_tpm_seal,
> > .unseal = trusted_tpm_unseal,
> > - .get_random = trusted_tpm_get_random,
> > .exit = trusted_tpm_exit,
> > };
>
> Reviewed-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
>
> Agreed that kernel code should prefer the standard Linux RNG whenever
> possible. Note that the standard Linux RNG already incorporates entropy
> from hardware RNGs, when available.
I get also the argument of using TPM RNG here just for the sake of
matching the creation with fully internally generated TPM objects.
I'm a bit little in-between what to do with this patch.
I suggested a comment to James. Other alternative would be do this
change and update this patch with a comment:
/*
* tpm_get_random() was used previously here as the RNG in order to match
* rng with the objects generated internally inside the TPM. However, since
* e.g., FIPS certification requires kernel crypto and rng to be FIPS
* certified, formally kernel_get_random() is equally legit source for
* the random numbers.
*/
It's longish but I think this fully covers the whole issue.
And if there is ever need to return to this, it's a good remainder of
the design choices.
>
> - Eric
BR, Jarkko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-15 20:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-14 21:32 [PATCH] KEYS: trusted: Use get_random-fallback for TPM Jarkko Sakkinen
2025-12-14 21:35 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2025-12-14 22:18 ` James Bottomley
2025-12-15 6:43 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2025-12-15 7:55 ` James Bottomley
2025-12-15 8:49 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2025-12-15 19:43 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2025-12-15 20:01 ` James Bottomley
2025-12-15 20:25 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2025-12-15 20:09 ` Eric Biggers
2025-12-15 20:35 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2025-12-15 21:09 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2025-12-16 6:48 ` James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aUBxKqL5hFibwI3r@kernel.org \
--to=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).