Hi Heinrich, On 2026-02-03T21:47:57+0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > Am 3. Februar 2026 21:27:44 MEZ schrieb Alejandro Colomar : > >Hi Alyssa, > > > >On 2026-02-03T20:53:33+0100, Alyssa Ross wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 03, 2026 at 08:50:01PM +0100, Alyssa Ross wrote: > >> > This is true for Fedora, where this page was sourced from, but I don't > >> > believe it has ever been true for the mainline kernel, because Linus > >> > rejected it. > >> > > >> > Link: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=2088704#p2088704 > >> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+55aFzYbpRAdma0PvqE+9ygySuKzNKByqOzzMufBoovXVnfPw@mail.gmail.com/ > >> > Fixes: bb509e6fc ("kernel_lockdown.7: New page documenting the Kernel Lockdown feature") > > > >I've now CCed you in an email documenting the format we use for these. > >It should be: > > > >Fixes: bb509e6fcbae (2020-10-16; "kernel_lockdown.7: New page documenting the Kernel Lockdown feature") > > > >I'll amend that myself. > > > >> > Signed-off-by: Alyssa Ross > >> > >> Just noticed there's a long-open bug for this as well, so additionally: > >> > >> Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213577 > > > >Thanks! I'll keep the patch for a few days, in case anyone wants to > >comment. > > > > > >Have a lovely night! > >Alex > > > > Can we move the information from the Notes section to replace the > removed statement? What causes lockdown is central for users. We can do that, yes. Although, I prefer doing it in a separate patch. Have a lovely night! Alex > > Best regards > > Heinrich > --