Linux Security Modules development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Günther Noack" <gnoack@google.com>
To: Matthieu Buffet <matthieu@buffet.re>
Cc: "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	"Mikhail Ivanov" <ivanov.mikhail1@huawei-partners.com>,
	konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com, "Tingmao Wang" <m@maowtm.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] landlock: Add UDP access control support
Date: Wed, 6 May 2026 17:33:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aftfVvru3npQ9kWq@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260502124306.3975990-1-matthieu@buffet.re>

Hello!

Thanks for sending another revision!

On Sat, May 02, 2026 at 02:42:59PM +0200, Matthieu Buffet wrote:
> This is V4 of UDP access control in Landlock. Thanks to the round of
> review of v3, access rights have changed to something that seems easier
> to use and understand. It adds only two access rights, to restrict
> configuring local and remote addresses on UDP sockets. The one that
> restricts setting a remote address also controls sending datagrams to
> explicit remote addresses -ignoring any remote address preset on the
> socket-. The one that restricts binding to a local port also applies
> when the kernel auto-binds an ephemeral port.
> v1:
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240916122230.114800-1-matthieu@buffet.re/
> v2:
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241214184540.3835222-1-matthieu@buffet.re/
> v3:
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251212163704.142301-1-matthieu@buffet.re/
> 
> The limitation around allowing a process to send but not receive is
> still there, and could warrant another patch if there is a real user
> need.
> I'm just not super happy about the clarity of logs generated for denied
> autobinds ("domain=xxxxxx blockers=net.bind_udp"), due to the fact that
> addresses and ports are currently only logged if they are non-0. A later
> (coordinated LSM-wide) patch could improve readability by replacing != 0
> checks with new booleans in struct lsm_network_audit. I'm also not
> exactly happy with the integration in existing TCP selftests, but
> refactoring them has already been discussed earlier.
> 
> Changes v1->v2
> ==============
> - recvmsg hook is gone and sendmsg hook doesn't apply when sending to a
>   remote address pre-set on socket, to improve performance
> - don't add a get_addr_port() helper function, which required a weird
>   "am I in IPv4 or IPv6 context"
> - reorder hook prologue for consistency: check domain, then type and
>   family
> 
> Changes v2->v3
> ==============
> - removed support for sending datagrams with explicit destination
>   address of family AF_UNSPEC, which allowed to bypass restrictions with
>   a race condition
> - rebased on linux-mic/next => add support for auditing
> - fixed mistake in selftests when using unspec_srv variables, which were
>   implicitly of type SOCK_STREAM and did not actually test UDP code
> - add tests for IPPROTO_IP
> - improved docs, split off TCP-related refactoring
> 
> Changes v3->v4
> ==============
> - merge LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_UDP and
>   LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_SENDTO_UDP into
>   LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_SEND_UDP (everything that might set the
>   destination of a datagram)

I wish the name could be more in-line with
LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_RESOLVE_UNIX, but since this does not need
resolving any more, "resolve" in the name would be confusing.  I also
failed to come up with a better name for this access right.


> - make LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_UDP apply when kernel is about to
>   auto-bind an ephemeral port for the caller. Block it if policy would
>   not allow an explicit call to bind(0)
> - only deny sending AF_UNSPEC datagrams on IPv6 sockets, where there is
>   a risk of the address family changing midway
> 
> Patch is based on https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mic/linux.git
> 3457a5ccacd3 ("landlock: Document fallocate(2) as another truncation corner case")
> All lines added are covered with selftests, except the "default: return
> 0" in current_check_autobind_udp_socket() which is not currently
> reachable (net.c goes from 92.9%->94.6% line coverage).
> 
> Let me know what you think!
> 
> Closes: https://github.com/landlock-lsm/linux/issues/10
> 
> Matthieu Buffet (7):
>   landlock: Add UDP bind() access control
>   landlock: Add UDP connect() access control
>   landlock: Add UDP send access control

For the final revision, I think it would be good to squash the two
commits that are about LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_SEND_UDP.  That
reduces the chances that someone backports the first but not the
second to one of the distribution kernels.


>   selftests/landlock: Add UDP bind/connect tests
>   selftests/landlock: Add tests for sendmsg()
>   samples/landlock: Add sandboxer UDP access control
>   landlock: Add documentation for UDP support
> 
>  Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst     |   89 +-
>  include/uapi/linux/landlock.h                |   35 +-
>  samples/landlock/sandboxer.c                 |   40 +-
>  security/landlock/audit.c                    |    3 +
>  security/landlock/limits.h                   |    2 +-
>  security/landlock/net.c                      |  161 ++-
>  security/landlock/syscalls.c                 |    2 +-
>  tools/testing/selftests/landlock/base_test.c |    4 +-
>  tools/testing/selftests/landlock/net_test.c  | 1146 ++++++++++++++++--
>  9 files changed, 1341 insertions(+), 141 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> base-commit: 3457a5ccacd34fdd5ebd3a4745e721b5a1239690
> -- 
> 2.39.5
> 

—Günther

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-05-06 15:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-02 12:42 [PATCH v4 0/7] landlock: Add UDP access control support Matthieu Buffet
2026-05-02 12:43 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] landlock: Add UDP bind() access control Matthieu Buffet
2026-05-02 12:43 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] landlock: Add UDP connect() " Matthieu Buffet
2026-05-02 12:43 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] landlock: Add UDP send " Matthieu Buffet
2026-05-02 12:43 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] selftests/landlock: Add UDP bind/connect tests Matthieu Buffet
2026-05-02 12:43 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] selftests/landlock: Add tests for sendmsg() Matthieu Buffet
2026-05-02 12:43 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] samples/landlock: Add sandboxer UDP access control Matthieu Buffet
2026-05-02 12:43 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] landlock: Add documentation for UDP support Matthieu Buffet
2026-05-06 15:33 ` Günther Noack [this message]
2026-05-07 22:11   ` [PATCH v4 0/7] landlock: Add UDP access control support Matthieu Buffet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aftfVvru3npQ9kWq@google.com \
    --to=gnoack@google.com \
    --cc=ivanov.mikhail1@huawei-partners.com \
    --cc=konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m@maowtm.org \
    --cc=matthieu@buffet.re \
    --cc=mic@digikod.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox