From: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>
To: "Günther Noack" <gnoack3000@gmail.com>
Cc: "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] landlock: Documentation wording cleanups
Date: Sat, 16 May 2026 21:19:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <agjBUgqr1b908oWn@devuan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260516190112.4924-1-gnoack3000@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2294 bytes --]
Hi Günther,
> Cc: Alejandro Colomar <alx.manpages@gmail.com>
I don't use that address anymore. (The gmail account still exists, but
I'll eventually remove it.)
On 2026-05-16T21:01:12+0200, Günther Noack wrote:
> Documentation cleanups suggested by Alejandro Colomar,
> which we have also applied in the man pages.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/agW4yMK6CinJGqXt@devuan/
> Suggested-by: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Günther Noack <gnoack3000@gmail.com>
> ---
> include/uapi/linux/landlock.h | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/landlock.h b/include/uapi/linux/landlock.h
> index 10a346e55e95..48c12ddf1108 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/landlock.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/landlock.h
> @@ -255,16 +255,16 @@ struct landlock_net_port_attr {
> * :manpage:`connect(2)` as well as calls to :manpage:`sendmsg(2)` with an
> * explicit recipient address.
> *
> - * This access right only applies to connections to UNIX server sockets which
> + * This access right applies only to connections to UNIX server sockets which
Yup. As a reminder, 'only' applies to whatever comes immediately after
it.
> * were created outside of the newly created Landlock domain (e.g. from within
> * a parent domain or from an unrestricted process). Newly created UNIX
> * servers within the same Landlock domain continue to be accessible. In this
> * regard, %LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_RESOLVE_UNIX has the same semantics as the
> * ``LANDLOCK_SCOPE_*`` flags.
> *
> - * If a resolve attempt is denied, the operation returns an ``EACCES`` error,
> - * in line with other filesystem access rights (but different to denials for
> - * abstract UNIX domain sockets).
> + * If a resolution attempt is denied, the operation returns an ``EACCES``
> + * error, in line with other filesystem access rights (but different to
> + * denials for abstract UNIX domain sockets).
I.e.: s/resolve/resolution/
I miss semantic newlines! :)
Have a lovely day!
Alex
> *
> * This access right is available since the ninth version of the Landlock ABI.
> *
> --
> 2.54.0
>
--
<https://www.alejandro-colomar.es>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-16 19:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-16 19:01 [PATCH] landlock: Documentation wording cleanups Günther Noack
2026-05-16 19:19 ` Alejandro Colomar [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=agjBUgqr1b908oWn@devuan \
--to=alx@kernel.org \
--cc=gnoack3000@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mic@digikod.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox