From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
To: Gui-Dong Han <hanguidong02@gmail.com>, dhowells@redhat.com
Cc: keyrings@vger.kernel.org, dhowells@redhat.com,
ebiggers@google.com, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, baijiaju1990@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KEYS: Use acquire when reading state in keyring search
Date: Sat, 30 May 2026 04:02:01 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aho3CYdv8lQd2s85@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260529033406.20673-1-hanguidong02@gmail.com>
On Fri, May 29, 2026 at 11:34:06AM +0800, Gui-Dong Han wrote:
> The negative-key race fix added release/acquire ordering for key use.
>
> Publish payload before state; read state before payload.
>
> keyring_search_iterator() still uses READ_ONCE() before match callbacks.
> An asymmetric match callback calls asymmetric_key_ids(), which reads
> key->payload.data[asym_key_ids].
>
> Use key_read_state() there to complete that ordering.
OK, so... I'm having a bit trouble understanding the exact concurrency
scenario you're trying to describe despite I think I get the fix itself
i.e. it is not pairing with mark_key_instantiated?
I'm a bit puzzled too why this was not done already in the original
commit despite introducing all the primitives.
>
> Fixes: 363b02dab09b ("KEYS: Fix race between updating and finding a negative key")
> Signed-off-by: Gui-Dong Han <hanguidong02@gmail.com>
> ---
> Found by auditing READ_ONCE() used for synchronization.
> A similar fix can be found in 8df672bfe3ec.
> ---
> security/keys/keyring.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/security/keys/keyring.c b/security/keys/keyring.c
> index b39038f7dd31..243fb1636f10 100644
> --- a/security/keys/keyring.c
> +++ b/security/keys/keyring.c
> @@ -576,7 +576,7 @@ static int keyring_search_iterator(const void *object, void *iterator_data)
> struct keyring_search_context *ctx = iterator_data;
> const struct key *key = keyring_ptr_to_key(object);
> unsigned long kflags = READ_ONCE(key->flags);
> - short state = READ_ONCE(key->state);
> + short state = key_read_state(key);
>
> kenter("{%d}", key->serial);
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>
BR, Jarkko
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-30 1:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-29 3:34 [PATCH] KEYS: Use acquire when reading state in keyring search Gui-Dong Han
2026-05-30 1:02 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aho3CYdv8lQd2s85@kernel.org \
--to=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=baijiaju1990@gmail.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiggers@google.com \
--cc=hanguidong02@gmail.com \
--cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox