Linux Security Modules development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
To: Gui-Dong Han <hanguidong02@gmail.com>, dhowells@redhat.com
Cc: keyrings@vger.kernel.org, dhowells@redhat.com,
	ebiggers@google.com, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, baijiaju1990@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KEYS: Use acquire when reading state in keyring search
Date: Sat, 30 May 2026 04:02:01 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aho3CYdv8lQd2s85@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260529033406.20673-1-hanguidong02@gmail.com>

On Fri, May 29, 2026 at 11:34:06AM +0800, Gui-Dong Han wrote:
> The negative-key race fix added release/acquire ordering for key use.
> 
> Publish payload before state; read state before payload.
> 
> keyring_search_iterator() still uses READ_ONCE() before match callbacks.
> An asymmetric match callback calls asymmetric_key_ids(), which reads
> key->payload.data[asym_key_ids].
> 
> Use key_read_state() there to complete that ordering.

OK, so... I'm having a bit trouble understanding the exact concurrency
scenario you're trying to describe despite I think I get the fix itself
i.e. it is not pairing with mark_key_instantiated?

I'm a bit puzzled too why this was not done already in the original
commit despite introducing all the primitives.

> 
> Fixes: 363b02dab09b ("KEYS: Fix race between updating and finding a negative key")
> Signed-off-by: Gui-Dong Han <hanguidong02@gmail.com>
> ---
> Found by auditing READ_ONCE() used for synchronization.
> A similar fix can be found in 8df672bfe3ec.
> ---
>  security/keys/keyring.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/security/keys/keyring.c b/security/keys/keyring.c
> index b39038f7dd31..243fb1636f10 100644
> --- a/security/keys/keyring.c
> +++ b/security/keys/keyring.c
> @@ -576,7 +576,7 @@ static int keyring_search_iterator(const void *object, void *iterator_data)
>  	struct keyring_search_context *ctx = iterator_data;
>  	const struct key *key = keyring_ptr_to_key(object);
>  	unsigned long kflags = READ_ONCE(key->flags);
> -	short state = READ_ONCE(key->state);
> +	short state = key_read_state(key);
>  
>  	kenter("{%d}", key->serial);
>  
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

BR, Jarkko

      reply	other threads:[~2026-05-30  1:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-29  3:34 [PATCH] KEYS: Use acquire when reading state in keyring search Gui-Dong Han
2026-05-30  1:02 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aho3CYdv8lQd2s85@kernel.org \
    --to=jarkko@kernel.org \
    --cc=baijiaju1990@gmail.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=ebiggers@google.com \
    --cc=hanguidong02@gmail.com \
    --cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox