Linux Security Modules development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Wang Yan <wangyan01@kylinos.cn>
Cc: "Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>,
	"Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>,
	"Günther Noack" <gnoack@google.com>,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] selftests: fix multiple spelling errors across submodules
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2026 07:18:42 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <akUhwrDSCjGLpnSg@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260701123520.271580-1-wangyan01@kylinos.cn>

On Wed, Jul 01, 2026, Wang Yan wrote:
> This series fixes trivial spelling typos in comments across multiple
> selftests subdirectories. All changes are pure comment fixes, no
> functional or logical change to any test logic.
> 
> Changes are split by subsystem for easier review and merging.

In the future, please send individual patches.  Splitting the patches is nice,
but then bundling them in a single series that affects different maintainer
domains reintroduces the friction you're trying to avoid, especially since most
of us only got the one patch.  E.g. I only received patch 4/6, which left me
wondering "what's in the other 5 patches?".

> Wang Yan (6):
>   selftests/arm64: fix spelling errors in comments
>   selftests/filesystems: fix spelling error in statmount test comment
>   selftests/ftrace: fix spelling error in poll test comment
>   selftests/kvm/x86: fix spelling error in xapic_ipi_test comment
>   selftests/landlock: fix spelling error in fs_test comment
>   selftests/powerpc/tm: fix spelling errors in comments
> 
>  tools/testing/selftests/arm64/gcs/libc-gcs.c                   | 2 +-
>  tools/testing/selftests/arm64/pauth/pac.c                      | 2 +-
>  tools/testing/selftests/filesystems/statmount/statmount_test.c | 2 +-
>  tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/poll.c                          | 2 +-
>  tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/xapic_ipi_test.c               | 2 +-
>  tools/testing/selftests/landlock/fs_test.c                     | 2 +-
>  tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/tm/tm-signal-msr-resv.c        | 2 +-
>  tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/tm/tm-signal-stack.c           | 2 +-
>  tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/tm/tm-tar.c                    | 2 +-
>  9 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 

      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-01 14:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-01 12:35 [PATCH 0/6] selftests: fix multiple spelling errors across submodules Wang Yan
2026-07-01 12:35 ` [PATCH 5/6] selftests/landlock: fix spelling error in fs_test comment Wang Yan
2026-07-01 14:18 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=akUhwrDSCjGLpnSg@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=gnoack@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mic@digikod.net \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=wangyan01@kylinos.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox