From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: james.l.morris@oracle.com (James Morris) Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 14:25:26 +1100 (AEDT) Subject: [RFC PATCH] ima: require secure_boot rules in lockdown mode In-Reply-To: <1509385178.3583.159.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1509382827.3583.143.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1508774387.3639.128.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <750.1509378910@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <3691.1509383138@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <1509385178.3583.159.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Message-ID: To: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-security-module.vger.kernel.org On Mon, 30 Oct 2017, Mimi Zohar wrote: > James is staging the subsystem patches independently of each other, in > case of a similar problem, so that they can be pulled separately. > ?There's a new "next-general" branch. If you send me a pull request, I'm combining branches into next-testing, too, which is pulled into -next. -- James Morris