From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jmorris@namei.org (James Morris) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 10:03:47 +1000 (AEST) Subject: Security updates for v4.15 and beyond In-Reply-To: References: <5b63c120-5116-1e77-d090-331d2ae3aa8e@schaufler-ca.com> Message-ID: To: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-security-module.vger.kernel.org On Tue, 26 Sep 2017, John Johansen wrote: > I have to agree with Paul here, unless there are infrastructure > changes this feels like an extra hop. With next directly pulling > security (for infrastructure) and LSM changes merge conflicts will > show up there. At which point we are going to need to coordinate, > but these should be rare. Ok, it seems a consensus is emerging to go with Paul's idea of having larger, frequently updated LSMs merge directly to Linus. If Linus is okay with that (I'm assuing he will be), then that's how we'll do thing from now. Of course, any LSM or other security mechanism is still welcome to be merged via my tree. -- James Morris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html