From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jmorris@namei.org (James Morris) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2018 19:59:19 +1000 (AEST) Subject: [PATCH v1 00/22] LSM: Full security module stacking In-Reply-To: <8e2bdc10-3142-9e8d-ff05-70fa4d862dd5@schaufler-ca.com> References: <8a325db8-e7eb-9581-2b77-fc987a165df7@schaufler-ca.com> <8e2bdc10-3142-9e8d-ff05-70fa4d862dd5@schaufler-ca.com> Message-ID: To: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-security-module.vger.kernel.org On Tue, 14 Aug 2018, Casey Schaufler wrote: > On 8/14/2018 4:22 PM, Jordan Glover wrote: > > On August 14, 2018 8:28 PM, Casey Schaufler wrote: > > > > On the other hand there is concern that those security modules might > > be abandoned if they have to wait until everything is finished :) > > There is some truth to that. If we can get commitment from the developers > of those security module to push for getting upstream, a statement of > intent to support additional modules (e.g. Landlock, S.A.R.A.) from a > significant distribution (e.g. Fedora, Ubuntu, SuSE) and ACKs from the > maintainers of the existing modules we should be able to breeze right in. > Sounds reasonable. Please focus on what's needed for Landlock and SARA. -- James Morris