From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20A5BC282CE for ; Sat, 25 May 2019 03:55:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E10FA2175B for ; Sat, 25 May 2019 03:55:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726598AbfEYDzK (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 May 2019 23:55:10 -0400 Received: from namei.org ([65.99.196.166]:34392 "EHLO namei.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726587AbfEYDzK (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 May 2019 23:55:10 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by namei.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x4P3t1LB032269; Sat, 25 May 2019 03:55:01 GMT Date: Sat, 25 May 2019 13:55:01 +1000 (AEST) From: James Morris To: Casey Schaufler cc: Paul Moore , Linux Security Module list , Kees Cook , John Johansen Subject: Re: Stacking patches for 5.3 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <1106985e-1620-75b2-d6bf-c2c95d9a0fbb@schaufler-ca.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (LRH 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: On Fri, 24 May 2019, Casey Schaufler wrote: > On 5/24/2019 12:37 PM, Paul Moore wrote: > > On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 3:26 PM Casey Schaufler wrote: > >> I have a set of 59 patches for the nest round of LSM stacking. > >> They are all really small. Kees has expressed a preference for > >> small patches. I think that the collapsed set of about 10 would > >> make more sense. Which would the community as a whole prefer? > >> The patches are not much different from what has been presented > >> already. > > Is there an option for "not posted on the Friday before a holiday weekend"? ;) > > I'm waiting for James' next-general to base it on, so you needn't worry. I won't be merging with Linus' tree unless there's a specific reason to, so go ahead with the current branch. -- James Morris