From: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>
To: sergeh@kernel.org
Cc: jack@suse.cz, djwong@kernel.org, hch@lst.de, serge@hallyn.com,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] capability: unexport has_capability_noaudit
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2026 11:56:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <anWro2_jU0RazltI@andromeda.toxiclabs.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <anTYXy17kYz6MivZ@AUS2MQ6190Y76.amd.com>
On Thu, Aug 06, 2026 at 01:54:23PM -0500, sergeh@kernel.org wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 04, 2026 at 11:45:55AM +0200, cem@kernel.org wrote:
> > From: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>
> >
> > This has been originally exported to be used in xfs. Giving we are not
> > using it anymore, unexport for consistency.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com>
> > Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
>
> Reviewed-by: Serge Hallyn <sergeh@kernel.org>
>
> Thanks, Carlos.
>
> Should these all just go in through the xfs tree?
Yeah, I'm pulling them through XFS tree if you are ok with it?!
Cheers.
>
> > ---
> > kernel/capability.c | 1 -
> > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/capability.c b/kernel/capability.c
> > index f4a7f1963c9d..90e6ab62f6db 100644
> > --- a/kernel/capability.c
> > +++ b/kernel/capability.c
> > @@ -326,7 +326,6 @@ bool has_capability_noaudit(struct task_struct *t, int cap)
> > {
> > return has_ns_capability_noaudit(t, &init_user_ns, cap);
> > }
> > -EXPORT_SYMBOL(has_capability_noaudit);
> >
> > static bool ns_capable_common(struct user_namespace *ns,
> > int cap,
> > --
> > 2.55.0
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-07 9:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-04 9:45 [PATCH v4 0/5] Fix quota evasion on xfs and add capable_noaudit cem
2026-08-04 9:45 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] xfs: fix capability check in xfs cem
2026-08-04 14:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-08-06 17:22 ` sergeh
2026-08-04 9:45 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] capability: Add new capable_noaudit cem
2026-08-06 18:49 ` sergeh
2026-08-04 9:45 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] quota: Don't issue audit messages on quota enforcing cem
2026-08-04 9:45 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] xfs: replace ns_capable_noaudit cem
2026-08-04 14:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-08-06 21:11 ` sergeh
2026-08-07 10:04 ` Carlos Maiolino
2026-08-04 9:45 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] capability: unexport has_capability_noaudit cem
2026-08-06 18:54 ` sergeh
2026-08-07 9:56 ` Carlos Maiolino [this message]
2026-08-06 21:09 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] Fix quota evasion on xfs and add capable_noaudit sergeh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=anWro2_jU0RazltI@andromeda.toxiclabs.cc \
--to=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=sergeh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox