From: "Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)" <ljs@kernel.org>
To: Ye Liu <ye.liu@linux.dev>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
Marco Elver <elver@google.com>, Ye Liu <liuye@kylinos.cn>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
Yi Tao <escape@linux.alibaba.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
paulmck@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
jpoimboe@kernel.org, mic@digikod.net, tglx@kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@kernel.org,
linmiaohe@huawei.com, nao.horiguchi@gmail.com, rafael@kernel.org,
gnoack3000@gmail.com, sj@kernel.org, rientjes@google.com,
shakeel.butt@linux.dev, xu.xin16@zte.com.cn,
chengming.zhou@linux.dev, will@kernel.org, boqun@kernel.org,
frederic@kernel.org, neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org,
joelagnelf@nvidia.com, josh@joshtriplett.org, urezki@gmail.com,
juri.lelli@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
tony.luck@intel.com, reinette.chatre@intel.com, x86@kernel.org,
paul@paul-moore.com, jmorris@namei.org, serge@hallyn.com,
pavel@kernel.org, lance.yang@linux.dev, mhiramat@kernel.org,
pmladek@suse.com, longman@redhat.com,
mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, jiangshanlai@gmail.com,
qiang.zhang@linux.dev, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, vschneid@redhat.com,
kprateek.nayak@amd.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
Dave.Martin@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com, babu.moger@amd.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, rcu@vger.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] sched: introduce for_each_process_rculock and for_each_thread_rculock
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2026 09:30:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ap51Mj0cqvAYb31k@gremlin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260907081334.1152889-2-ye.liu@linux.dev>
On Mon, Sep 07, 2026 at 04:13:27PM +0800, Ye Liu wrote:
> From: Ye Liu <liuye@kylinos.cn>
>
> Introduce for_each_process_rculock(), for_each_thread_rculock() and
> for_each_process_thread_rculock() macros that acquire the RCU read
> lock before the iteration starts and release it when the loop is left,
> so that the RCU read-side critical section is scoped to the loop body
> instead of an externally managed rcu_read_lock()/rcu_read_unlock()
> pair.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ye Liu <liuye@kylinos.cn>
> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Some nits below, with those addressed, LGTM so:
Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) <ljs@kernel.org>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Rename macros from *_rcu to *_rculock (Steven Rostedt, Thomas Gleixner)
> - Improve comment on for_each_process_thread_rculock() double loop
> - Change prefix from mm: to sched: (Michal Hocko)
> include/linux/sched/signal.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched/signal.h b/include/linux/sched/signal.h
> index 584ae88b435e..110ea9f131f3 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched/signal.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched/signal.h
> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
> #ifndef _LINUX_SCHED_SIGNAL_H
> #define _LINUX_SCHED_SIGNAL_H
>
> +#include <linux/cleanup.h>
> #include <linux/rculist.h>
> #include <linux/signal.h>
> #include <linux/sched.h>
> @@ -663,6 +664,30 @@ extern bool current_is_single_threaded(void);
> #define for_each_process_thread(p, t) \
> for_each_process(p) for_each_thread(p, t)
>
> +/*
> + * Variants of for_each_process(), for_each_thread() and
> + * for_each_process_thread() that automatically acquire and release the
> + * RCU read lock via scoped_guard(rcu). The lock is held for the
> + * duration of the loop and released on exit, including via break,
> + * goto, or return.
> + */
> +#define for_each_process_rculock(p) \
> + scoped_guard(rcu) \
> + for (p = &init_task ; (p = next_task(p)) != &init_task ; )
NIT: Can you indent the for loop by a tab? Since the for is in
scoped_guard() scope and that's not made clear.
> +
> +#define for_each_thread_rculock(p, t) \
> + scoped_guard(rcu) \
> + __for_each_thread((p)->signal, t)
Same comment as above.
> +
> +/*
> + * Double loop: 'break' only exits the inner for_each_thread() loop.
> + * Use 'goto' to exit both loops; the RCU read lock is released
> + * automatically when the scoped_guard scope is left.
> + */
> +#define for_each_process_thread_rculock(p, t) \
> + scoped_guard(rcu) \
> + for_each_process(p) for_each_thread(p, t)
Yeah this is even worse for clarity :) I know the existing defines do itg
this way but it's kinda confusing.
I know it's a bit fugly, but it's MUCH clearer as:
#define for_each_process_thread_rculock(p, t) \
scoped_guard(rcu) \
for_each_process(p) \
for_each_thread(p, t)
> +
> typedef int (*proc_visitor)(struct task_struct *p, void *data);
> void walk_process_tree(struct task_struct *top, proc_visitor, void *);
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
--
Cheers, Lorenzo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-07 8:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-07 8:13 [PATCH v2 0/8] sched: introduce for_each_process_rculock and for_each_thread_rculock Ye Liu
2026-09-07 8:13 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] " Ye Liu
2026-09-07 8:30 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) [this message]
2026-09-07 9:35 ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-09-07 15:42 ` Gregory Price
2026-09-07 21:20 ` SJ Park
2026-09-07 8:13 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] mm/oom_kill: convert process/thread iterators to for_each_*_rculock Ye Liu
2026-09-07 8:35 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-09-07 15:42 ` Gregory Price
2026-09-07 8:13 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] mm/ksm: convert process iterator to for_each_process_rculock Ye Liu
2026-09-07 8:36 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-09-07 15:43 ` Gregory Price
2026-09-07 8:13 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] mm/memory-failure: " Ye Liu
2026-09-07 11:05 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-09-07 15:43 ` Gregory Price
2026-09-07 21:24 ` SJ Park
2026-09-07 8:13 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] kernel: convert process/thread iterators to for_each_*_rculock Ye Liu
2026-09-07 12:20 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-09-07 15:53 ` Gregory Price
2026-09-07 17:57 ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-09-07 21:05 ` Gregory Price
2026-09-07 21:54 ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-09-07 22:27 ` Gregory Price
2026-09-07 22:44 ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-09-08 2:27 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-09-08 6:35 ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-09-08 7:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-09-07 21:28 ` SJ Park
2026-09-08 6:42 ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-09-08 7:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-09-07 8:13 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] fs: " Ye Liu
2026-09-07 12:27 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-09-07 15:47 ` Gregory Price
2026-09-07 21:40 ` SJ Park
2026-09-07 8:13 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] lib: convert process iterator to for_each_process_rculock Ye Liu
2026-09-07 12:27 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-09-07 15:47 ` Gregory Price
2026-09-07 21:42 ` SJ Park
2026-09-07 8:13 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] security/landlock: convert thread iterator to for_each_thread_rculock Ye Liu
2026-09-07 12:28 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-09-07 15:49 ` Gregory Price
2026-09-07 21:44 ` SJ Park
2026-09-07 8:26 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] sched: introduce for_each_process_rculock and for_each_thread_rculock Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ap51Mj0cqvAYb31k@gremlin \
--to=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=boqun@kernel.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=chengming.zhou@linux.dev \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=escape@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=gnoack3000@gmail.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liuye@kylinos.cn \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mic@digikod.net \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nao.horiguchi@gmail.com \
--cc=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=qiang.zhang@linux.dev \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xu.xin16@zte.com.cn \
--cc=ye.liu@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox