Linux Security Modules development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>
To: GONG Ruiqi <gongruiqi1@huawei.com>
Cc: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>,
	Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huaweicloud.com>,
	linux-coco@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@oracle.com>,
	linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	Dan Williams <djbw@kernel.org>, Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
	Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>,
	Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com>,
	Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
	James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
	Suzuki Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
	Sami Mujawar <sami.mujawar@arm.com>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>,
	Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/3] security: ima: support TSM measurement registers
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2026 09:41:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <as3uzQ7L6tJ-Lu-Q@e129823.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9e74ff9d-e8a3-425e-bf7c-f973d06e6cdf@huawei.com>

> On 10/1/2026 10:24 PM, Yeoreum Yun wrote:
> > Hi Roberto,
> > 
> >> On Thu, 2026-10-01 at 13:27 +0200, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 2026-09-30 at 14:43 +0100, Yeoreum Yun wrote:
> >>>> Confidential computing guests without a TPM can use TSM measurement
> >>>> registers to record IMA measurement digests instead of TPM PCRs.
> >>
> >> + Gong Ruiqi, of course.
> >>
> >> Roberto
> 
> Hi Roberto,
> 
> Thank you for involving me!
> 
> >>
> >>> Hi Yeoreum
> >>>
> >>> a similar patch set has been sent to the linux-integrity mailing list:
> >>>
> >>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/20250630125928.765285-1-gongruiqi1@huawei.com/
> >>>
> >>> Could you please work with Gong Ruiqi to have a unified proposal?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>>
> >>> Roberto
> >>>
> > 
> > Thanks for letting me know and I think the proposal is almost the same
> > with the different terminology only.
> > 
> > @Gong, what do you think?
> 
> Hi Yeoreum,
> 
> Nice to see this topic picked up again — I'm glad the IMA RoT framework
> series I posted last year is still of interest.
> 
> Yes, I'd be happy to work with you on a unified proposal. It's been a
> while since I last worked on that series, so I'll first revisit my
> previous patch set, and then follow up with you to discuss the code details.
> 
> Looking forward to working with you.
> 
> BR,
> Ruiqi

Hi Ruiqi :)

Thanks for replying and I'm happy with you too.
However, I think we need to rework based on the Jiri's patch [0].

Any thought?

Link: [0] https://github.com/jpirko/linux_mlxsw/tree/wip_attestation_pre_rfc_draft1 


-- 
Sincerely,
Yeoreum Yun

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-13  8:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-30 13:43 [PATCH RFC 0/3] security: ima: support TSM measurement registers Yeoreum Yun
2026-09-30 13:43 ` [PATCH RFC 1/3] virt: coco: introduce tsm_default_tm() and tsm_mr_read()/write() Yeoreum Yun
2026-09-30 13:55   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-30 13:44 ` [PATCH RFC 2/3] security: IMA: introduce ima_mr structure Yeoreum Yun
2026-09-30 13:55   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-30 13:44 ` [PATCH RFC 3/3] security: IMA: use TSM measurement registers Yeoreum Yun
2026-09-30 13:59   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-01 11:27 ` [PATCH RFC 0/3] security: ima: support " Roberto Sassu
2026-10-01 11:45   ` Roberto Sassu
2026-10-01 14:24     ` Yeoreum Yun
2026-10-08 11:10       ` GONG Ruiqi
2026-10-13  8:41         ` Yeoreum Yun [this message]
2026-10-13 13:05           ` GONG Ruiqi
2026-10-13 13:37             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-01 15:18     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-01 16:39       ` Yeoreum Yun

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=as3uzQ7L6tJ-Lu-Q@e129823.arm.com \
    --to=yeoreum.yun@arm.com \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=djbw@kernel.org \
    --cc=dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com \
    --cc=eric.snowberg@oracle.com \
    --cc=gongruiqi1@huawei.com \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
    --cc=roberto.sassu@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=sami.mujawar@arm.com \
    --cc=serge@hallyn.com \
    --cc=steven.price@arm.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox