From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1793803799; b=5aiDr+Ss2nOdUbfu8fUy6bqkD1gqI4mEXLyY+nBb/5P1IYY1AulnlqOFT1Ym/7qkwVFV yz/hkN13m4nKEDr9HaGi5mzhaE8v/4hD6HY1/K80tWt9Ne+uZH3bPL4z0PMcv1y5jf5st +P8sWTuUnv/BUOqKtxBD2bq2/D0JCF5KSQhXO+ZV1k0XQGZ+RIa7yhXZnwStORa1694d6 jJmky93gNOB4kgfQ1j3nclInME5pZApbXhqzBDFUWC2QS7QqGpbRHxX33U3eBDA1EoEJt ju7OiK4IiOLgn2L9kZbcN+rK3/6Jy1mF75DFpWm5GVustYWh+M1c4N0jeUF985o+/3A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1793803799; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID: References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; bh=nj54x/PQdCgAxP/mlDRhP4+MFQGS04Hb6AKl7jhv+pk=; b=w32SFoLvB1Y777Mv4qb7uW2HpcHb4mJqV5XHUBdIIuWGLIlukArlFxXUfg7xdbIxJxLK 7VpCHO/sJ4pJkhoMeiFt5eyN33/fmtUSpHMJwKCJBvDn5CIpFZivR7MvXv2hRLx2obTLX j8mogGQ+qannfk89zCdKc6HyyjB0IGbajzU2ShOeL6pTtNy77N0fl8C3CQ6NtR5g168D6 LSJTVq2uKbSM+RVJvjzGNnD8jSLZi+/ycS4SzBvu7PRzhi5AfPf4ZCdNmmEKSuajX3D8i XmveI2KXm3galIGdj5SBOXHkUXeyff2LjPEQ+VrSTbd0j1vOx3cT4Z5Wok71sUYW2Yg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=GuEPdpeb; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with UTF8SMTPS id B3A31606A31B; Wed, 4 Nov 2026 14:49:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=GuEPdpeb Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with UTF8SMTPSA id D7CDC1F000C1; Wed, 4 Nov 2026 14:49:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1793803798; bh=nj54x/PQdCgAxP/mlDRhP4+MFQGS04Hb6AKl7jhv+pk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=GuEPdpeblNIZZEPu2ifH16aCWebHTCYB3smAwlR/AXyp+TJESinIa0Vfik3JWt1/C 0UsJjbplxrG0JJgz/hyOWsrwK+bzcZPLiHl2lpOd/ftlGWd0OyMY11zH/uqre1D7Uy +Y1Emxiux9evaxMo5U1xW2gf/LWSVi83mv51/2uD5DoBEJWOZOZXWVTf5vWByY7+Y3 I8QesgFEeWj9oEEh2keVirWcTnrIOStOmkFantGTIGLkUhskO5n7vt366Y9jUO+It/ WnEOFAXjPbPialw9fPWbLw5o3P1sDJ+JgkG7nTp4EKp1CLxqO6KPB2MCkUpU05Th63 YVoSSxRHGwu/Q== Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2026 16:49:54 +0200 From: Jarkko Sakkinen To: BeaCox <0xbeac@gmail.com> Cc: David Howells , Paul Moore , James Morris , "Serge E. Hallyn" , keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] KEYS: Protect pkey method checks against type removal Message-ID: References: <20261104021414.50696-1-0xbeac@gmail.com> X-Mailing-List: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20261104021414.50696-1-0xbeac@gmail.com> On Wed, Nov 04, 2026 at 10:14:14AM +0800, BeaCox wrote: > I saw your "KEYS: Pin the backing kernel module for a key type" RFC. If > that lands first this local fix should become unnecessary; I'm happy to > rebase or drop this patch, whichever you prefer. So that will never be backported so in that sense fixing these issues is fine. Br, Jarkko