From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1794266038; b=TGVCwQiRqf9GwIpPHOifcJsA1Pqxp2Fo6L8O6VRVZLiS8Xiu1MMkPbrfEGpkodlQaCpX Ae1sihLUvIv095SxA+nEu0mI0b3uNHL2ZeYEmYKN/JYiDjmj6Ciztp7VhgkAT4NMHy2ZK q4A6IPwWMCBBSH5ojCA7PW0UMEyUQfFPALgN4t/dbLFLlw+UZA2p1YYWH0IXFaMXNAQw1 u2F50OZ5RBmKxlYSb54vKr6HlqPQxXFeQZrh55v1Y6Z0XWm7dcYfdIkyUwJRYulmTyqE8 6ThlVAK56k1447/P1e9anWTPHs2iRGkoimGvHIxyaKYhfA+AjKIAJpcTsLN1A6NxaWA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1794266038; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID: References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; bh=IC6PJ/RZVkQgMpY8cIohbFHuIH5eqvjrcXnHJ1rI6uY=; b=dVx1Mde254U6AEyTJp8jzrvB1hxoZkq56bzGsIn8HS5tE2xuC3SP7uC9t19lCAL/kFz1 njCopDpWST6SxjdFU5W8mh4sdfnRTfQLDRV9lyeYJ3wsgoQ8IiE8Gaflq8Sk2oXx7sLf+ A+mNC8X1xFr9Pqqa9x+8ECtLB0C+RM9vrVGZJ5ilmAhqRbPNdZ0VzyLygMNvFvM0+53gO CLr1UVnpQ14H5YX5R5dvye7huK6spJMslc4PW411KcR1CjUMjDUZekLDWrgCMA2MYAcaN gAy0dyPNVuNI/HIBDbHbaskSPEK0PurFy8g9m/kFeNEsvDURlrWC1e9GDbba6EARqMg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=hlRoaz+F; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with UTF8SMTPS id 28822606A31C; Mon, 9 Nov 2026 23:13:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=hlRoaz+F Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with UTF8SMTPSA id 4C1421F0089F; Mon, 9 Nov 2026 23:13:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1794266037; bh=IC6PJ/RZVkQgMpY8cIohbFHuIH5eqvjrcXnHJ1rI6uY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=hlRoaz+FYhaKeQrUUn6debqh1nygeJvK3YQfYYgaklSvf1hUgfCsE8iQjuggGwFcc KYVURUH0yM9BsgmDIqW3uU0UzCdMvV18zlqfWlkOHnuDW0Pc2XK/DmiG7YrXN1ZQSp bhCRyX86WYQy/XhnBu0TJBVniqL+6QmmcyJmLpB3D0NtUv0zLxbIvBGst50YoqdNPZ /JqY7UyAxhuYuIlIYOcKPEacHnUkpuj2MvLj+NSIxgclM23cy1tNfhxpsFWgvqOYZN RLeMSKshTMTS1ktK8EFJCXJypWBcg6k1O0fWUIyrqgUCOb2unBxZjvV5K+mIMjLBPq 1wm79nHvLy0mQ== Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2026 01:13:53 +0200 From: Jarkko Sakkinen To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev Cc: David Howells , keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, Alexander Gordeev , Anna Schumaker , Bharath SM , Christian Borntraeger , "David S. Miller" , Eric Biggers , Eric Dumazet , Heiko Carstens , Jakub Kicinski , James Bottomley , James Morris , Marc Dionne , Mimi Zohar , Namjae Jeon , Paolo Abeni , Paul Moore , Paulo Alcantara , Ronnie Sahlberg , "Serge E. Hallyn" , Shyam Prasad N , Simon Horman , Sumit Garg , Sven Schnelle , Tom Talpey , Trond Myklebust , Vasily Gorbik , Chuck Lever , Jeff Layton Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 06/12] KEYS: trusted: TEE: Synchronize session lifetime Message-ID: References: <20261108222719.304712-1-jarkko@kernel.org> <20261108222719.304712-7-jarkko@kernel.org> X-Mailing-List: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Mon, Nov 09, 2026 at 10:28:27PM +0000, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote: > Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential > issue to consider: > - [Low] KEYS: trusted: missing Fixes trailers for TEE lifetime and > init_trusted() fixes It's kind of weird that this was the only relevant Sashiko response. I went through all the others and they are "no issues" responses. Just wanted to address this so that there is no misimpression that the patch set would need another "Sashiko spin". The issue above should not be considered a blocker for a review, and is trivial to address. Br, Jarkko