Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/3] bpf: cgroup: Introduce helper cgroup_bpf_current_enabled()

[Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>]

On 12/14/23 12:17 AM, Michael Weiß wrote:
> On 13.12.23 17:59, Yonghong Song wrote:
>> On 12/13/23 6:38 AM, Michael Weiß wrote:
>>> This helper can be used to check if a cgroup-bpf specific program is
>>> active for the current task.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Michael Weiß <michael.weiss@aisec.fraunhofer.de>
>>> Reviewed-by: Alexander Mikhalitsyn <aleksandr.mikhalitsyn@canonical.com>
>>> ---
>>>    include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h |  2 ++
>>>    kernel/bpf/cgroup.c        | 14 ++++++++++++++
>>>    2 files changed, 16 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h b/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h
>>> index a789266feac3..7cb49bde09ff 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h
>>> @@ -191,6 +191,8 @@ static inline bool cgroup_bpf_sock_enabled(struct sock *sk,
>>>    	return array != &bpf_empty_prog_array.hdr;
>>>    }
>>>    
>>> +bool cgroup_bpf_current_enabled(enum cgroup_bpf_attach_type type);
>>> +
>>>    /* Wrappers for __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_skb() guarded by cgroup_bpf_enabled. */
>>>    #define BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_INET_INGRESS(sk, skb)			      \
>>>    ({									      \
>>> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c b/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
>>> index 491d20038cbe..9007165abe8c 100644
>>> --- a/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
>>> +++ b/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
>>> @@ -24,6 +24,20 @@
>>>    DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_ARRAY_FALSE(cgroup_bpf_enabled_key, MAX_CGROUP_BPF_ATTACH_TYPE);
>>>    EXPORT_SYMBOL(cgroup_bpf_enabled_key);
>>>    
>>> +bool cgroup_bpf_current_enabled(enum cgroup_bpf_attach_type type)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct cgroup *cgrp;
>>> +	struct bpf_prog_array *array;
>>> +
>>> +	rcu_read_lock();
>>> +	cgrp = task_dfl_cgroup(current);
>>> +	rcu_read_unlock();
>>> +
>>> +	array = rcu_access_pointer(cgrp->bpf.effective[type]);
>> This seems wrong here. The cgrp could become invalid once leaving
>> rcu critical section.
> You are right, maybe we where to opportunistic here. We just wanted
> to hold the lock as short as possible.
>
>>> +	return array != &bpf_empty_prog_array.hdr;
>> I guess you need include 'array' usage as well in the rcu cs.
>> So overall should look like:
>>
>> 	rcu_read_lock();
>> 	cgrp = task_dfl_cgroup(current);
>> 	array = rcu_access_pointer(cgrp->bpf.effective[type]);
> Looks reasonable, but that we are in the cs now I would change this to
> rcu_dereference() then.

copy-paste error. Right, should use rcu_deference() indeed.

>
>> 	bpf_prog_exists = array != &bpf_empty_prog_array.hdr;
>> 	rcu_read_unlock();
>>
>> 	return bpf_prog_exists;
>>
>>> +}
>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(cgroup_bpf_current_enabled);
>>> +
>>>    /* __always_inline is necessary to prevent indirect call through run_prog
>>>     * function pointer.
>>>     */