From: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
To: Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@oracle.com>,
zohar@linux.ibm.com, jarkko@kernel.org, dhowells@redhat.com,
dwmw2@infradead.org
Cc: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, davem@davemloft.net,
jmorris@namei.org, serge@hallyn.com, nayna@linux.ibm.com,
mic@linux.microsoft.com, konrad.wilk@oracle.com,
keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] X.509: Parse Basic Constraints for CA
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2022 10:10:17 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b6e9eb1e-846c-c98e-ad16-c651b5e1dad7@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220301173651.3435350-3-eric.snowberg@oracle.com>
On 3/1/22 12:36, Eric Snowberg wrote:
> Parse the X.509 Basic Constraints. The basic constraints extension
> identifies whether the subject of the certificate is a CA.
>
> BasicConstraints ::= SEQUENCE {
> cA BOOLEAN DEFAULT FALSE,
> pathLenConstraint INTEGER (0..MAX) OPTIONAL }
>
> If the CA is true, store it in a new public_key field call key_is_ca.
> This will be used in a follow on patch that requires knowing if the
> public key is a CA.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@oracle.com>
> ---
> crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_cert_parser.c | 9 +++++++++
> include/crypto/public_key.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_cert_parser.c b/crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_cert_parser.c
> index 2899ed80bb18..38c907f4ce27 100644
> --- a/crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_cert_parser.c
> +++ b/crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_cert_parser.c
> @@ -583,6 +583,15 @@ int x509_process_extension(void *context, size_t hdrlen,
> return 0;
> }
>
> + if (ctx->last_oid == OID_basicConstraints) {
Don't you have to check whether you can access v[0] and v[1]?
if (vlen < 3)
return -EBADMSG;
or should it even be
if (vlen != 3)
return -EBADMSG;
> + if (v[0] != (ASN1_CONS_BIT | ASN1_SEQ))
> + return -EBADMSG;
> + if (v[1] != vlen - 2)
> + return -EBADMSG;
> + if (v[1] != 0 && v[2] == ASN1_BOOL && v[3] == 1)
> + ctx->cert->pub->key_is_ca = true;
> + }
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> diff --git a/include/crypto/public_key.h b/include/crypto/public_key.h
> index 6d61695e1cde..0521241764b7 100644
> --- a/include/crypto/public_key.h
> +++ b/include/crypto/public_key.h
> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ struct public_key {
> void *params;
> u32 paramlen;
> bool key_is_private;
> + bool key_is_ca;
> const char *id_type;
> const char *pkey_algo;
> };
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-04 15:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-01 17:36 [PATCH 0/4] Add CA enforcement in the machine keyring Eric Snowberg
2022-03-01 17:36 ` [PATCH 1/4] KEYS: Create static version of public_key_verify_signature Eric Snowberg
2022-03-01 17:36 ` [PATCH 2/4] X.509: Parse Basic Constraints for CA Eric Snowberg
2022-03-04 15:10 ` Stefan Berger [this message]
2022-03-07 18:02 ` Eric Snowberg
2022-03-01 17:36 ` [PATCH 3/4] KEYS: CA link restriction Eric Snowberg
2022-03-04 15:28 ` Stefan Berger
2022-03-07 18:06 ` Eric Snowberg
2022-03-07 23:01 ` Mimi Zohar
2022-03-07 23:38 ` Eric Snowberg
2022-03-08 2:31 ` Stefan Berger
2022-03-08 12:45 ` Mimi Zohar
2022-03-08 13:56 ` Stefan Berger
2022-03-08 18:02 ` Eric Snowberg
2022-03-09 17:12 ` Stefan Berger
2022-03-09 17:17 ` Stefan Berger
2022-03-09 18:13 ` Eric Snowberg
2022-03-09 19:02 ` Stefan Berger
2022-03-11 18:44 ` Eric Snowberg
2022-03-11 20:23 ` Stefan Berger
2022-03-14 12:00 ` Stefan Berger
2022-03-09 17:33 ` Mimi Zohar
2022-03-01 17:36 ` [PATCH 4/4] integrity: CA enforcement in machine keyring Eric Snowberg
2022-03-04 23:19 ` Stefan Berger
2022-03-07 18:13 ` Eric Snowberg
2022-03-07 18:36 ` Stefan Berger
2022-03-07 18:48 ` Eric Snowberg
2022-03-06 23:33 ` [PATCH 0/4] Add CA enforcement in the " Mimi Zohar
2022-03-07 18:55 ` Eric Snowberg
2022-03-09 18:43 ` Mimi Zohar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b6e9eb1e-846c-c98e-ad16-c651b5e1dad7@linux.ibm.com \
--to=stefanb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=eric.snowberg@oracle.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mic@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=nayna@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).