From: brdeoliv@redhat.com (Bruno E. O. Meneguele)
To: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] ima: change how MODULE_SIG_FORCE is checked on modules checking policy
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 14:43:00 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1508776704.git.brdeoliv@redhat.com> (raw)
This patchset ensure that IMA's modules checking policy:
measure func=MODULE_CHECK uid=0
rely on the correct value of CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_FORCE, since the way it
is today the code completely ignores the module.sig_enforce cmdline
param, which behaves in a OR logic with the CONFIG value
(CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_FORCE || module.sig_enforce). That said, everytime a
module would load, in the current checking code, when the kernel was not
compiled with the CONFIG set the call to init_module syscall fails with
-EACCES:
# strace -f -v modprobe <any-module> | grep init_module
init_module(0x55b9bcc9bba0, 17763, "") = -1 EACCES (Permission denied)
With this patchset the result would rely on the module.sig_enforce
cmdline as well. Once the CONFIG is not set, but the param is, the
result would be 'success', as it should be:
# strace -f -v modprobe <any-module> | grep init_module
init_module(0x7f9602d6e010, 386646, "") = 0
The patchset was tested in two different kernels: 4.13.6 (Fedora 27) and
4.14.0-rc4 (integrity-next tree)
Bruno E. O. Meneguele (2):
module: export module signature enforcement status
ima: check signature enforcement against cmdline param instead of
CONFIG
include/linux/module.h | 2 ++
kernel/module.c | 10 ++++++++++
security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 6 +++---
3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--
2.13.6
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next reply other threads:[~2017-10-23 16:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-23 16:43 Bruno E. O. Meneguele [this message]
2017-10-23 16:43 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] module: export module signature enforcement status Bruno E. O. Meneguele
2017-10-23 16:43 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] ima: check signature enforcement against cmdline param instead of CONFIG Bruno E. O. Meneguele
2017-10-24 10:41 ` kbuild test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cover.1508776704.git.brdeoliv@redhat.com \
--to=brdeoliv@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).