From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
To: Tushar Sugandhi <tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com>,
stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com, casey@schaufler-ca.com,
agk@redhat.com, snitzer@redhat.com, gmazyland@gmail.com,
paul@paul-moore.com
Cc: tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com, sashal@kernel.org,
jmorris@namei.org, nramas@linux.microsoft.com,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 7/8] IMA: add a built-in policy rule for critical data measurement
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 09:30:02 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e151e67e0749766c1b501ecc54dbeb0450c0cea2.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201119232611.30114-8-tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com>
Hi Lakshmi,
On Thu, 2020-11-19 at 15:26 -0800, Tushar Sugandhi wrote:
> From: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com>
>
> The IMA hook to measure kernel critical data, namely
> ima_measure_critical_data(), could be called before a custom IMA policy
> is loaded.
> Define a new critical data builtin policy to allow measuring
> early kernel integrity critical data before a custom IMA policy is
> loaded.
Everything needing to be said seems to be included in the second
sentence. Does the first sentence add anything? "Define a new
critical data builtin policy" makes for a good Subject line.
>
> Add critical data to built-in IMA rules if the kernel command line
> contains "ima_policy=critical_data".
The boot command line parameters are defined in Documentation/admin-
guide/kernel-parameters.txt. Please update "ima_policy".
>
> Signed-off-by: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com>
> ---
> security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
> index c9e52dab0638..119604a3efa0 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
> @@ -206,6 +206,10 @@ static struct ima_rule_entry secure_boot_rules[] __ro_after_init = {
> .flags = IMA_FUNC | IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED},
> };
>
> +static struct ima_rule_entry critical_data_rules[] __ro_after_init = {
> + {.action = MEASURE, .func = CRITICAL_DATA, .flags = IMA_FUNC},
> +};
> +
> /* An array of architecture specific rules */
> static struct ima_rule_entry *arch_policy_entry __ro_after_init;
>
> @@ -228,6 +232,7 @@ __setup("ima_tcb", default_measure_policy_setup);
>
> static bool ima_use_appraise_tcb __initdata;
> static bool ima_use_secure_boot __initdata;
> +static bool ima_use_critical_data __ro_after_init;
Unlike ima_fail_unverifiable_sigs, ima_use_critical_data is only used
during __init. Please change "__ro_after_init" to "__initdata". (The
critical data policy itself is defined properly as __ro_after_init.)
> static bool ima_fail_unverifiable_sigs __ro_after_init;
> static int __init policy_setup(char *str)
> {
> @@ -242,6 +247,8 @@ static int __init policy_setup(char *str)
> ima_use_appraise_tcb = true;
> else if (strcmp(p, "secure_boot") == 0)
> ima_use_secure_boot = true;
> + else if (strcmp(p, "critical_data") == 0)
> + ima_use_critical_data = true;
> else if (strcmp(p, "fail_securely") == 0)
> ima_fail_unverifiable_sigs = true;
> else
> @@ -875,6 +882,11 @@ void __init ima_init_policy(void)
> ARRAY_SIZE(default_appraise_rules),
> IMA_DEFAULT_POLICY);
>
> + if (ima_use_critical_data)
> + add_rules(critical_data_rules,
> + ARRAY_SIZE(critical_data_rules),
> + IMA_DEFAULT_POLICY);
> +
> ima_update_policy_flag();
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-20 14:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-19 23:26 [PATCH v6 0/8] IMA: support for measuring kernel integrity critical data Tushar Sugandhi
2020-11-19 23:26 ` [PATCH v6 1/8] IMA: generalize keyring specific measurement constructs Tushar Sugandhi
2020-11-19 23:26 ` [PATCH v6 2/8] IMA: add support to measure buffer data hash Tushar Sugandhi
2020-11-19 23:26 ` [PATCH v6 3/8] IMA: define a hook to measure kernel integrity critical data Tushar Sugandhi
2020-11-19 23:26 ` [PATCH v6 4/8] IMA: add policy rule to measure " Tushar Sugandhi
2020-11-19 23:26 ` [PATCH v6 5/8] IMA: extend policy to add data sources as a critical data measurement constraint Tushar Sugandhi
2020-11-19 23:26 ` [PATCH v6 6/8] IMA: add support to critical data hook to limit data sources for measurement Tushar Sugandhi
2020-11-19 23:26 ` [PATCH v6 7/8] IMA: add a built-in policy rule for critical data measurement Tushar Sugandhi
2020-11-20 14:30 ` Mimi Zohar [this message]
2020-11-20 23:33 ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2020-11-19 23:26 ` [PATCH v6 8/8] selinux: measure state and hash of the policy using IMA Tushar Sugandhi
2020-11-20 15:49 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-11-20 23:40 ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2020-11-21 2:05 ` James Morris
2020-11-23 19:37 ` Tushar Sugandhi
2020-11-20 12:46 ` [PATCH v6 0/8] IMA: support for measuring kernel integrity critical data Pavel Machek
2020-11-22 20:53 ` Tushar Sugandhi
2020-11-22 21:00 ` Pavel Machek
2020-11-23 13:41 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-11-23 17:18 ` Pavel Machek
2020-11-23 19:49 ` Mimi Zohar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e151e67e0749766c1b501ecc54dbeb0450c0cea2.camel@linux.ibm.com \
--to=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=gmazyland@gmail.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nramas@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com \
--cc=tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).