linux-security-module.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
To: Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@oracle.com>,
	Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	"dwmw2@infradead.org" <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	"herbert@gondor.apana.org.au" <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"jmorris@namei.org" <jmorris@namei.org>,
	"serge@hallyn.com" <serge@hallyn.com>,
	"nayna@linux.ibm.com" <nayna@linux.ibm.com>,
	"mic@linux.microsoft.com" <mic@linux.microsoft.com>,
	Konrad Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	"keyrings@vger.kernel.org" <keyrings@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org" 
	<linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] KEYS: CA link restriction
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2022 18:01:43 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e2dd58cd6074ae692256333b43b5ecde70bcdbdd.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2415444C-AD8F-4F03-8B1C-C0770F83ADAE@oracle.com>

On Mon, 2022-03-07 at 18:06 +0000, Eric Snowberg wrote:
> 
> >> diff --git a/crypto/asymmetric_keys/restrict.c b/crypto/asymmetric_keys/restrict.c
> >> index 6b1ac5f5896a..49bb2ea7f609 100644
> >> --- a/crypto/asymmetric_keys/restrict.c
> >> +++ b/crypto/asymmetric_keys/restrict.c
> >> @@ -108,6 +108,49 @@ int restrict_link_by_signature(struct key *dest_keyring,
> >>  	return ret;
> >>  }
> >>  +/**
> >> + * restrict_link_by_ca - Restrict additions to a ring of CA keys
> >> + * @dest_keyring: Keyring being linked to.
> >> + * @type: The type of key being added.
> >> + * @payload: The payload of the new key.
> >> + * @trust_keyring: Unused.
> >> + *
> >> + * Check if the new certificate is a CA. If it is a CA, then mark the new
> >> + * certificate as being ok to link.
> > 
> > CA = root CA here, right?
> 
> Yes, I’ll update the comment

Updating the comment is not enough.  There's an existing function named
"x509_check_for_self_signed()" which determines whether the certificate
is self-signed.

thanks,

Mimi


  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-07 23:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-01 17:36 [PATCH 0/4] Add CA enforcement in the machine keyring Eric Snowberg
2022-03-01 17:36 ` [PATCH 1/4] KEYS: Create static version of public_key_verify_signature Eric Snowberg
2022-03-01 17:36 ` [PATCH 2/4] X.509: Parse Basic Constraints for CA Eric Snowberg
2022-03-04 15:10   ` Stefan Berger
2022-03-07 18:02     ` Eric Snowberg
2022-03-01 17:36 ` [PATCH 3/4] KEYS: CA link restriction Eric Snowberg
2022-03-04 15:28   ` Stefan Berger
2022-03-07 18:06     ` Eric Snowberg
2022-03-07 23:01       ` Mimi Zohar [this message]
2022-03-07 23:38         ` Eric Snowberg
2022-03-08  2:31           ` Stefan Berger
2022-03-08 12:45             ` Mimi Zohar
2022-03-08 13:56               ` Stefan Berger
2022-03-08 18:02               ` Eric Snowberg
2022-03-09 17:12                 ` Stefan Berger
2022-03-09 17:17                   ` Stefan Berger
2022-03-09 18:13                   ` Eric Snowberg
2022-03-09 19:02                     ` Stefan Berger
2022-03-11 18:44                       ` Eric Snowberg
2022-03-11 20:23                         ` Stefan Berger
2022-03-14 12:00                           ` Stefan Berger
2022-03-09 17:33                 ` Mimi Zohar
2022-03-01 17:36 ` [PATCH 4/4] integrity: CA enforcement in machine keyring Eric Snowberg
2022-03-04 23:19   ` Stefan Berger
2022-03-07 18:13     ` Eric Snowberg
2022-03-07 18:36       ` Stefan Berger
2022-03-07 18:48         ` Eric Snowberg
2022-03-06 23:33 ` [PATCH 0/4] Add CA enforcement in the " Mimi Zohar
2022-03-07 18:55   ` Eric Snowberg
2022-03-09 18:43 ` Mimi Zohar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e2dd58cd6074ae692256333b43b5ecde70bcdbdd.camel@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=eric.snowberg@oracle.com \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mic@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=nayna@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=serge@hallyn.com \
    --cc=stefanb@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).