From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1C2FC433EF for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2022 15:55:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S242361AbiFCPzo (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Jun 2022 11:55:44 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57568 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231203AbiFCPzn (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Jun 2022 11:55:43 -0400 Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75403BE04; Fri, 3 Jun 2022 08:55:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1654271742; x=1685807742; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=blHQrZ0g94mMvLynPtoK8ncChfAm2Hug5DTS5ZrddFY=; b=CtJI9fgQDZorAHra/fjotVhBPOpocWYo7ZaQ3gYhAB4xVed+EOUqzAbq DRIIgqAQl/r2HHB6ckyeEn+WEe9jCyNi4dsHmpTW+nuJhCKMV8dHlF2ZH YE4Xc9P5ojNqt/IC7xyqmpaNscSmAWATRotnJnE71BnQ7/YUzP4Vcg3uI 1Saejw4A/8RxDKosn2QE7nNDWxV6wx6zzLpKnwVnF/V4Vw05OReNy5oUY lwNkWyL0P03a4fJuaP2JQxvvfAuG8bfepfuqkX97FPp+gp6h9qAo8Z17J pHtxnIDpygi6gO7YrnllDX7V47gmjxDg4VuA7bkvoQ2e/lpq10NrVKS1V Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6400,9594,10367"; a="362649491" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.91,274,1647327600"; d="scan'208";a="362649491" Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Jun 2022 08:55:42 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.91,274,1647327600"; d="scan'208";a="613323243" Received: from fbarati-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.251.24.19]) ([10.251.24.19]) by orsmga001-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Jun 2022 08:55:41 -0700 Message-ID: Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2022 08:55:39 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.9.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] x86/kexec: Carry forward IMA measurement log on kexec Content-Language: en-US To: Jonathan McDowell , Borislav Petkov Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Mimi Zohar , Dave Hansen , "x86@kernel.org" , "H. Peter Anvin" , Dmitry Kasatkin , James Morris , "Serge E. Hallyn" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org" , Eric Biederman , kexec@lists.infradead.org References: <8634d4dd0813b9522f039ed211023c2c65c6f888.camel@linux.ibm.com> From: Dave Hansen In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: On 5/30/22 01:40, Jonathan McDowell wrote: > Borislav, > > I don't think there are any outstanding review comments for me to deal > with on this, so is it safe to assume it'll get picked up at some point > once the merge window calms down? Nothing here looks too crazy, but it's still been _very_ lightly reviewed. It doesn't seem like anyone from the kexec world has seen it, for instance. Mimi's review was a great start, but it would be really nice to make sure that the kexec bits look good.