linux-security-module.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
To: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "John Johansen" <john.johansen@canonical.com>,
	"Roberto Sassu" <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>,
	"Fan Wu" <wufan@kernel.org>, "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>,
	"Günther Noack" <gnoack@google.com>,
	"Kees Cook" <kees@kernel.org>,
	"Micah Morton" <mortonm@chromium.org>,
	"Casey Schaufler" <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
	"Tetsuo Handa" <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
	"Nicolas Bouchinet" <nicolas.bouchinet@oss.cyber.gouv.fr>,
	"Xiu Jianfeng" <xiujianfeng@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 04/34] lsm: introduce looping macros for the initialization code
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2025 06:45:33 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f2a83662bc18c250b32a7f1fa8743d402d2d4ec7.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250916220355.252592-40-paul@paul-moore.com>

On Tue, 2025-09-16 at 18:03 -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
> There are three common for loop patterns in the LSM initialization code
> to loop through the ordered LSM list and the registered "early" LSMs.
> This patch implements these loop patterns as macros to help simplify the
> code and reduce the chance for errors.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
> Reviewed-by: John Johansen <john.johhansen@canonical.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>

Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>

> ---
>  security/lsm_init.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/security/lsm_init.c b/security/lsm_init.c
> index 6f40ab1d2f54..18828a65c364 100644
> --- a/security/lsm_init.c
> +++ b/security/lsm_init.c
> @@ -32,6 +32,15 @@ static __initdata bool debug;
>  			pr_info(__VA_ARGS__);				\
>  	} while (0)
>  
> +#define lsm_order_for_each(iter)					\
> +	for ((iter) = ordered_lsms; *(iter); (iter)++)
> +#define lsm_for_each_raw(iter)						\
> +	for ((iter) = __start_lsm_info;					\
> +	     (iter) < __end_lsm_info; (iter)++)
> +#define lsm_early_for_each_raw(iter)					\
> +	for ((iter) = __start_early_lsm_info;				\
> +	     (iter) < __end_early_lsm_info; (iter)++)
> +
>  static int lsm_append(const char *new, char **result);
>  
>  /* Save user chosen LSM */
> @@ -96,9 +105,10 @@ static bool __init exists_ordered_lsm(struct lsm_info *lsm)
>  {
>  	struct lsm_info **check;
>  
> -	for (check = ordered_lsms; *check; check++)
> +	lsm_order_for_each(check) {
>  		if (*check == lsm)
>  			return true;
> +	}
>  
>  	return false;
>  }
> @@ -209,7 +219,7 @@ static void __init ordered_lsm_parse(const char *order, const char *origin)
>  	char *sep, *name, *next;
>  
>  	/* LSM_ORDER_FIRST is always first. */
> -	for (lsm = __start_lsm_info; lsm < __end_lsm_info; lsm++) {
> +	lsm_for_each_raw(lsm) {
>  		if (lsm->order == LSM_ORDER_FIRST)
>  			append_ordered_lsm(lsm, "  first");
>  	}
> @@ -224,8 +234,7 @@ static void __init ordered_lsm_parse(const char *order, const char *origin)
>  		 * if the selected one was separately disabled: disable
>  		 * all non-matching Legacy Major LSMs.
>  		 */
> -		for (major = __start_lsm_info; major < __end_lsm_info;
> -		     major++) {
> +		lsm_for_each_raw(major) {
>  			if ((major->flags & LSM_FLAG_LEGACY_MAJOR) &&
>  			    strcmp(major->name, chosen_major_lsm) != 0) {
>  				set_enabled(major, false);
> @@ -241,7 +250,7 @@ static void __init ordered_lsm_parse(const char *order, const char *origin)
>  	while ((name = strsep(&next, ",")) != NULL) {
>  		bool found = false;
>  
> -		for (lsm = __start_lsm_info; lsm < __end_lsm_info; lsm++) {
> +		lsm_for_each_raw(lsm) {
>  			if (strcmp(lsm->name, name) == 0) {
>  				if (lsm->order == LSM_ORDER_MUTABLE)
>  					append_ordered_lsm(lsm, origin);
> @@ -256,7 +265,7 @@ static void __init ordered_lsm_parse(const char *order, const char *origin)
>  
>  	/* Process "security=", if given. */
>  	if (chosen_major_lsm) {
> -		for (lsm = __start_lsm_info; lsm < __end_lsm_info; lsm++) {
> +		lsm_for_each_raw(lsm) {
>  			if (exists_ordered_lsm(lsm))
>  				continue;
>  			if (strcmp(lsm->name, chosen_major_lsm) == 0)
> @@ -265,13 +274,13 @@ static void __init ordered_lsm_parse(const char *order, const char *origin)
>  	}
>  
>  	/* LSM_ORDER_LAST is always last. */
> -	for (lsm = __start_lsm_info; lsm < __end_lsm_info; lsm++) {
> +	lsm_for_each_raw(lsm) {
>  		if (lsm->order == LSM_ORDER_LAST)
>  			append_ordered_lsm(lsm, "   last");
>  	}
>  
>  	/* Disable all LSMs not in the ordered list. */
> -	for (lsm = __start_lsm_info; lsm < __end_lsm_info; lsm++) {
> +	lsm_for_each_raw(lsm) {
>  		if (exists_ordered_lsm(lsm))
>  			continue;
>  		set_enabled(lsm, false);
> @@ -290,13 +299,14 @@ static void __init report_lsm_order(void)
>  	pr_info("initializing lsm=");
>  
>  	/* Report each enabled LSM name, comma separated. */
> -	for (early = __start_early_lsm_info;
> -	     early < __end_early_lsm_info; early++)
> +	lsm_early_for_each_raw(early) {
>  		if (is_enabled(early))
>  			pr_cont("%s%s", first++ == 0 ? "" : ",", early->name);
> -	for (lsm = ordered_lsms; *lsm; lsm++)
> +	}
> +	lsm_order_for_each(lsm) {
>  		if (is_enabled(*lsm))
>  			pr_cont("%s%s", first++ == 0 ? "" : ",", (*lsm)->name);
> +	}
>  
>  	pr_cont("\n");
>  }
> @@ -343,8 +353,9 @@ static void __init ordered_lsm_init(void)
>  	} else
>  		ordered_lsm_parse(builtin_lsm_order, "builtin");
>  
> -	for (lsm = ordered_lsms; *lsm; lsm++)
> +	lsm_order_for_each(lsm) {
>  		lsm_prepare(*lsm);
> +	}
>  
>  	report_lsm_order();
>  
> @@ -382,8 +393,9 @@ static void __init ordered_lsm_init(void)
>  
>  	lsm_early_cred((struct cred *) current->cred);
>  	lsm_early_task(current);
> -	for (lsm = ordered_lsms; *lsm; lsm++)
> +	lsm_order_for_each(lsm) {
>  		initialize_lsm(*lsm);
> +	}
>  }
>  
>  static bool match_last_lsm(const char *list, const char *lsm)
> @@ -485,7 +497,7 @@ int __init early_security_init(void)
>  {
>  	struct lsm_info *lsm;
>  
> -	for (lsm = __start_early_lsm_info; lsm < __end_early_lsm_info; lsm++) {
> +	lsm_early_for_each_raw(lsm) {
>  		if (!lsm->enabled)
>  			lsm->enabled = &lsm_enabled_true;
>  		lsm_prepare(lsm);
> @@ -512,7 +524,7 @@ int __init security_init(void)
>  	 * Append the names of the early LSM modules now that kmalloc() is
>  	 * available
>  	 */
> -	for (lsm = __start_early_lsm_info; lsm < __end_early_lsm_info; lsm++) {
> +	lsm_early_for_each_raw(lsm) {
>  		init_debug("  early started: %s (%s)\n", lsm->name,
>  			   is_enabled(lsm) ? "enabled" : "disabled");
>  		if (lsm->enabled)


  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-19 10:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-16 22:03 [PATCH v4 0/34] Rework the LSM initialization Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 01/34] lsm: split the notifier code out into lsm_notifier.c Paul Moore
2025-09-19 10:44   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 02/34] lsm: split the init code out into lsm_init.c Paul Moore
2025-09-19 10:45   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 03/34] lsm: consolidate lsm_allowed() and prepare_lsm() into lsm_prepare() Paul Moore
2025-09-19 10:45   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 04/34] lsm: introduce looping macros for the initialization code Paul Moore
2025-09-19 10:45   ` Mimi Zohar [this message]
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 05/34] lsm: integrate report_lsm_order() code into caller Paul Moore
2025-09-19 10:45   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 06/34] lsm: integrate lsm_early_cred() and lsm_early_task() " Paul Moore
2025-09-19 10:45   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 07/34] lsm: rename ordered_lsm_init() to lsm_init_ordered() Paul Moore
2025-09-19 10:45   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 08/34] lsm: replace the name field with a pointer to the lsm_id struct Paul Moore
2025-09-19 19:02   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 09/34] lsm: rename the lsm order variables for consistency Paul Moore
2025-09-19 19:02   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 10/34] lsm: rework lsm_active_cnt and lsm_idlist[] Paul Moore
2025-09-19 19:02   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 11/34] lsm: get rid of the lsm_names list and do some cleanup Paul Moore
2025-09-19 19:15   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-21 19:23     ` Paul Moore
2025-09-22 10:52       ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-22 21:52         ` Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 12/34] lsm: rework the LSM enable/disable setter/getter functions Paul Moore
2025-09-19 19:04   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 13/34] lsm: rename exists_ordered_lsm() to lsm_order_exists() Paul Moore
2025-09-19 19:05   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 14/34] lsm: rename/rework append_ordered_lsm() into lsm_order_append() Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 15/34] lsm: rename/rework ordered_lsm_parse() to lsm_order_parse() Paul Moore
2025-09-18 11:29   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-18 15:38     ` Paul Moore
2025-09-18 15:55       ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 16/34] lsm: cleanup the LSM blob size code Paul Moore
2025-09-18 15:14   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 17/34] lsm: cleanup initialize_lsm() and rename to lsm_init_single() Paul Moore
2025-09-18 15:28   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 18/34] lsm: fold lsm_init_ordered() into security_init() Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 19/34] lsm: add/tweak function header comment blocks in lsm_init.c Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 20/34] lsm: cleanup the debug and console output " Paul Moore
2025-09-18 15:50   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-18 15:54     ` Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 21/34] lsm: output available LSMs when debugging Paul Moore
2025-09-18 17:11   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 22/34] lsm: group lsm_order_parse() with the other lsm_order_*() functions Paul Moore
2025-09-18 17:22   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 23/34] lsm: introduce an initcall mechanism into the LSM framework Paul Moore
2025-09-18 17:19   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 24/34] loadpin: move initcalls to " Paul Moore
2025-09-18 11:15   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-18 15:27     ` Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 25/34] ipe: " Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 26/34] smack: " Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 27/34] tomoyo: " Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 28/34] safesetid: " Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 29/34] apparmor: " Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 30/34] lockdown: " Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 31/34] ima,evm: " Paul Moore
2025-09-30 20:11   ` Paul Moore
2025-10-01 17:03     ` Mimi Zohar
2025-10-01 17:23       ` Paul Moore
2025-10-10 16:53     ` Mimi Zohar
2025-10-10 19:21       ` Paul Moore
2025-10-10 10:19   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 32/34] selinux: " Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:04 ` [PATCH v4 33/34] lsm: consolidate all of the LSM framework initcalls Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:04 ` [PATCH v4 34/34] lsm: add a LSM_STARTED_ALL notification event Paul Moore

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f2a83662bc18c250b32a7f1fa8743d402d2d4ec7.camel@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --cc=gnoack@google.com \
    --cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mic@digikod.net \
    --cc=mortonm@chromium.org \
    --cc=nicolas.bouchinet@oss.cyber.gouv.fr \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
    --cc=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
    --cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wufan@kernel.org \
    --cc=xiujianfeng@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).