From: Alex Colomar <alx.manpages@gmail.com>
To: "Günther Noack" <gnoack3000@gmail.com>,
"Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
Konstantin Meskhidze <konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com>,
Xiu Jianfeng <xiujianfeng@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] landlock: Clarify documentation for the LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER right
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2023 00:00:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f46d3b7f-71bf-7a5e-90b5-ab433f7253cd@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230221165205.4231-1-gnoack3000@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1272 bytes --]
Hi Günther,
On 2/21/23 17:52, Günther Noack wrote:
[...]
Sorry for taking so much time in looking into this!
> + *
> + * * The reparented file may not gain more access rights in the destination
> + * directory than it previously had in the source directory. If this is
> + * attempted, the operation results in an ``EXDEV`` error.
> + *
> + * * When linking or renaming, the ``LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_*`` right for the
> + * respective file type must be granted for the destination directory.
> + * Otherwise, the operation results in an ``EACCES`` error.
> + *
> + * * When renaming, the ``LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REMOVE_*`` right for the
> + * respective file type must be granted for the source directory. Otherwise,
> + * the operation results in an ``EACCES`` error.
> + *
> + * If multiple requirements are not met, the ``EACCES`` error code takes
> + * precedence over ``EXDEV``.
Is this something worth guaranteeing, or just an implementation detail
that may easily change?
Cheers,
Alex
> *
> * .. warning::
> *
>
> base-commit: c9c3395d5e3dcc6daee66c6908354d47bf98cb0c
--
<http://www.alejandro-colomar.es/>
GPG key fingerprint: A9348594CE31283A826FBDD8D57633D441E25BB5
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-24 23:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-21 16:52 [PATCH v4] landlock: Clarify documentation for the LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER right Günther Noack
2023-02-21 17:22 ` Mickaël Salaün
2023-02-24 23:00 ` Alex Colomar [this message]
2023-02-27 11:02 ` Mickaël Salaün
2023-02-27 13:30 ` Alejandro Colomar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f46d3b7f-71bf-7a5e-90b5-ab433f7253cd@gmail.com \
--to=alx.manpages@gmail.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=gnoack3000@gmail.com \
--cc=konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mic@digikod.net \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=xiujianfeng@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).