linux-security-module.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "chengjian (D)" <cj.chengjian@huawei.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
	NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>,
	Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@netapp.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	"Xiexiuqi (Xie XiuQi)" <xiexiuqi@huawei.com>,
	"Li Bin" <huawei.libin@huawei.com>,
	Jason Yan <yanaijie@huawei.com>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"Linux Security Module list"
	<linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
	SELinux <selinux@vger.kernel.org>,
	Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: kernel BUG at kernel/cred.c:434!
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 22:46:01 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fa325d38-db66-0ae7-0a6c-75934a9b0653@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGXu5jKYmoaR6bxW82ogN4iOeKi8AtEwkvVvCXd_gn3CCwFU2Q@mail.gmail.com>


On 2019/4/16 11:40, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 11:20 AM Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 11:05 AM Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> On 04/15, Paul Moore wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 9:43 AM Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>> Well, acct("/proc/self/attr/current") doesn't look like a good idea, but I do
>>>>> not know where should we put the additional check... And probably
>>>>> "echo /proc/self/attr/current > /proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern" can hit the
>>>>> same problem, do_coredump() does override_creds() too.
>>>>>
>>>>> May be just add
>>>>>
>>>>>          if (current->cred != current->real_cred)
>>>>>                  return -EACCES;
>>>>>
>>>>> into proc_pid_attr_write(), I dunno.
>>>> Is the problem that do_acct_process() is calling override_creds() and
>>>> the returned/old credentials are being freed before do_acct_process()
>>>> can reinstall the creds via revert_creds()?  Presumably because the
>>>> process accounting is causing the credentials to be replaced?
>>> Afaics, the problem is that do_acct_process() does override_creds() and
>>> then __kernel_write(). Which calls proc_pid_attr_write(), which in turn calls
>>> selinux_setprocattr(), which does another prepare_creds() + commit_creds();
>>> and commit_creds() hits
>>>
>>>          BUG_ON(task->cred != old);
>> Gotcha.  In the process of looking at the backtrace I forgot about the
>> BUG_ON() at the top of the oops message.
>>
>> I wonder what terrible things would happen if we changed the BUG_ON()
>> in commit_creds to simple returning an error an error code to the
>> caller.  There is a warning/requirement in commit_creds() function
>> header comment that it should always return 0.
> Would callers be expected to call abort_creds() on failure? There are
> a number of places where it'd need fixing up. And would likely be best
> with a __must_check marking.
>
> It seems like avoiding the pathological case might be simpler?


Yeah, Avoiding this pathological case is a better solution.

It seems like that we can't commit_creds() during

override_creds() and revert_creds().

So how about just put commit_creds outside !


just like:

     override_creds()   // cred  -=> new

     // may BUG_ON if commit_creds done.

     revert_creds()     //  cred -=> old                         
<-----------|

     commit_creds   //  cred = real_cred = new                |

[revert_creds]--------------------------------------------------|


[1]--Before we call commit_creds in selinux_setprocattr(),

if we find that cred != real_cred, it may have been overridden

before, we should revert it.

[2]--The same to revert_creds, when we found someone have committed,

orig_cred != current->real_cred may hits, this means that

we have reverted before(see [1]).

[3]--Sometimes new and old are the same, then we need to consider this

situation specially.


The code just like:


From: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2019 21:56:01 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] fix cred bug_on

Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
---
  kernel/acct.c            | 3 ++-
  kernel/cred.c            | 6 ++++++
  security/selinux/hooks.c | 2 ++
  3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/acct.c b/kernel/acct.c
index addf7732fb56..f2065f899eee 100644
--- a/kernel/acct.c
+++ b/kernel/acct.c
@@ -522,7 +522,8 @@ static void do_acct_process(struct bsd_acct_struct 
*acct)
      }
  out:
      current->signal->rlim[RLIMIT_FSIZE].rlim_cur = flim;
-    revert_creds(orig_cred);
+    if (orig_cred == current->real_cred)    // [2]
+        revert_creds(orig_cred);
  }

  /**
diff --git a/kernel/cred.c b/kernel/cred.c
index ecf03657e71c..c4d5ba92fb9b 100644
--- a/kernel/cred.c
+++ b/kernel/cred.c
@@ -522,6 +522,9 @@ const struct cred *override_creds(const struct cred 
*new)
  {
      const struct cred *old = current->cred;

+    if (old == new)    //  [3]
+        return old;
+
      kdebug("override_creds(%p{%d,%d})", new,
             atomic_read(&new->usage),
             read_cred_subscribers(new));
@@ -551,6 +554,9 @@ void revert_creds(const struct cred *old)
  {
      const struct cred *override = current->cred;

+    if (override == old)    // [3]
+        return;
+
      kdebug("revert_creds(%p{%d,%d})", old,
             atomic_read(&old->usage),
             read_cred_subscribers(old));
diff --git a/security/selinux/hooks.c b/security/selinux/hooks.c
index b5017beb4ef7..bc8108e4e90f 100644
--- a/security/selinux/hooks.c
+++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c
@@ -6590,6 +6590,8 @@ static int selinux_setprocattr(const char *name, 
void *value, size_t size)
          goto abort_change;
      }

+    if (current->cred != current->real_cred)    // [1]
+        revert_creds(current->real_cred);
      commit_creds(new);
      return size;

-- 
2.17.1


We have tested this patch for 3 days and it works well.

Are there any cases that are not covered here ?


Thanks.

     Cheng Jian



  reply	other threads:[~2019-04-16 14:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <6e4428ca-3da1-a033-08f7-a51e57503989@huawei.com>
2019-04-12 15:28 ` kernel BUG at kernel/cred.c:434! Casey Schaufler
2019-04-15 13:43   ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-04-15 14:48     ` Paul Moore
2019-04-15 15:05       ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-04-15 16:20         ` Paul Moore
2019-04-16  3:40           ` Kees Cook
2019-04-16 14:46             ` chengjian (D) [this message]
2019-04-17 14:30               ` Paul Moore
2019-04-17 14:57                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-04-17 15:39                   ` Casey Schaufler
2019-04-17 15:40                   ` Paul Moore
2019-04-17 16:27                     ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-04-17 16:42                       ` Casey Schaufler
2019-04-18 13:39                         ` Stephen Smalley
2019-04-17 23:39                       ` Paul Moore
2019-04-18  0:17                         ` John Johansen
2019-04-18  0:24                         ` Casey Schaufler
2019-04-18  2:49                           ` Yang Yingliang
2019-04-19  2:04                             ` Paul Moore
2019-04-19  2:34                               ` Yang Yingliang
2019-04-19 13:24                                 ` Paul Moore
2019-04-19 14:34                                   ` Yang Yingliang
2019-04-19 16:13                                     ` Paul Moore
2019-04-20  7:38                                       ` Yang Yingliang
2019-04-22 19:48                                         ` Paul Moore
2019-04-23  4:08                                           ` Yang Yingliang
2019-04-23 20:18                                             ` Paul Moore

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fa325d38-db66-0ae7-0a6c-75934a9b0653@huawei.com \
    --to=cj.chengjian@huawei.com \
    --cc=Anna.Schumaker@netapp.com \
    --cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --cc=huawei.libin@huawei.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=neilb@suse.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=xiexiuqi@huawei.com \
    --cc=yanaijie@huawei.com \
    --cc=yangyingliang@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).