From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B21AE44CAC6 for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2026 10:09:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791367800; cv=none; b=GxfACTGmpz+N12Kr5mmHC8EtFNFSmQl+dXBHBj1/r5d497DPXG/YGGRkw6SwjqdV0QNRE5YnLy4zwXCnSEXSIEgU15/RcleyuLr1wl/PLRduMAF/jh/UZ0JscMQTtKQh/nVSTaXbF3LnPz0IMlsVlHE0jc5MN1pgVEBmYZs2nZw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791367800; c=relaxed/simple; bh=A1FL7QZLuG2LfWs2A7BDFlrPtYkTdOGbrHwKCPItGmc=; h=Message-ID:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type: Date; b=lmOOKMvzROlS/1lRHzKAK3dvmVbe+DKwiKjyelUdxu9dcz+QVMsqEXvwr9SoOIGZoP7hs+Az7YDPtgVoqk5MJ2ZlVnFAHvEWuZA3HtAbFr0wLft1qgqJn7nDrMJQX6oOOjadBLsuKJu3SEXlfeqBuu+cL2lClmD3iNHDU/1oqAY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=WFpTmbLY; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="WFpTmbLY" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4D0F71F008A0 for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2026 10:09:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1791367791; bh=g+vDrcNETmge1AaglIYcl3kzu055MWCInLNBjFIzBKQ=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=WFpTmbLYoDWutT4fpOl4A0LqJQwhS8NUJJ6BTE/epERE1AedtNUhHImGHc0s9UbKl /i7OGJfBS6+EzZrOsAwjYHCGLZAkVmO8DZoPA/927N/jTbYp2bsoIfRrINpIEuSLAV ZVGDp4EpOYj1Co0n+TGkQJ0FK+GOuZa5nHQYiMnw1BcPZJd3M+EpX/K5aFDHRvf4zr TZ8LB8FbNK3O+fdtsut0pkpXwIzOxs3+vShTYTPhDYo+yptcjKm8HPAXdi8yG0gX6t r78poX8dlthtvB2fQXbVBMLHO4MIiqIf8l4BtKg9FatyVqU37Jysjw04UNFDez4SVl YtAtTCibCeMVA== Message-ID: From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/8] landlock: Rename quiet_masks to quiet_access Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20261007100255.1333386-2-mic@digikod.net> References: <20261007100255.1333386-1-mic@digikod.net> <20261007100255.1333386-2-mic@digikod.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2026 10:09:50 +0000 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > The base stores the fs/net/scope quiet bitmasks in a struct access_masks > field named quiet_masks. A following commit adds the sibling struct > permission_masks field quiet_permission for capabilities and namespaces. > quiet_masks drops the access category and keeps the type half ("masks"), > while quiet_permission keeps the category and drops the type half, so > the two read as an inconsistent pair. >=20 > Rename the base field to quiet_access, giving the symmetric, > category-named pair quiet_access/quiet_permission that also matches the > UAPI handled_access_*/quiet_access_* naming. This is a > no-functional-change rename. >=20 > Cc: G=C3=BCnther Noack > Cc: Tingmao Wang > Reviewed-by: Tingmao Wang > Signed-off-by: Micka=C3=ABl Sala=C3=BCn Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261007100255.1333= 386-1-mic@digikod.net?part=3D1