From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/8] landlock: Enforce capability restrictions
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2026 10:11:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-162844@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261007100255.1333386-5-mic@digikod.net>
> Add Landlock enforcement for capability use via the LSM capable hook.
> This lets a sandboxed process restrict which Linux capabilities it can
> exercise, using LANDLOCK_PERMISSION_CAPABILITY_USE and per-capability
> rules.
>
> The check is a flat per-layer allowed-capabilities test, with no
> domain-ancestry bypass, no cross-namespace discriminant, and no
> dependency on the target user namespace. These categorical denials
> return -EPERM, like the namespace permission introduced by the previous
> commit, and they mirror its per-capability allowed and quiet masks, so
> LANDLOCK_ADD_RULE_QUIET stays rejected for this rule type. Successful
> capability rules and denials are traced as the previous commit
> describes.
>
> Enforce only at capability exercise time rather than modifying the
> [ ... ]
> Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
> Cc: Günther Noack <gnoack@google.com>
> Cc: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
> Cc: Serge E. Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great!
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261007100255.1333386-1-mic@digikod.net?part=4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-07 10:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-07 10:02 [PATCH v5 0/8] Landlock: Namespace and capability control Mickaël Salaün
2026-10-07 10:02 ` [PATCH v5 1/8] landlock: Rename quiet_masks to quiet_access Mickaël Salaün
2026-10-07 10:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-07 10:02 ` [PATCH v5 2/8] landlock: Wrap per-layer access masks in struct layer_config Mickaël Salaün
2026-10-07 10:10 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-07 10:02 ` [PATCH v5 3/8] landlock: Enforce namespace use restrictions Mickaël Salaün
2026-10-07 10:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-07 10:02 ` [PATCH v5 4/8] landlock: Enforce capability restrictions Mickaël Salaün
2026-10-07 10:11 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-07 10:02 ` [PATCH v5 5/8] selftests/landlock: Add namespace restriction tests Mickaël Salaün
2026-10-07 10:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-07 10:02 ` [PATCH v5 6/8] selftests/landlock: Add capability " Mickaël Salaün
2026-10-07 10:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-07 10:02 ` [PATCH v5 7/8] samples/landlock: Add capability and namespace restriction support Mickaël Salaün
2026-10-07 10:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-07 10:02 ` [PATCH v5 8/8] landlock: Add documentation for capability and namespace restrictions Mickaël Salaün
2026-10-07 10:10 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-162844@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox