From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6546D4A0934 for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2026 08:33:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791966836; cv=none; b=suMFJ2cKI732N+dvwGTDz7tjixVhFSjcoxebC7eM95+G0FGPJoVrzhCl/U5qZ9803/py6rr41iBcUlpK2M/YDY8C0426+p2eQMPA7U/wLQEb8d5CmqR8+Gs/HAMM70yBV3lTy1dpi35vCo5grzRBZVPNaVQ8Fif8Lg5Y9n17h8U= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791966836; c=relaxed/simple; bh=1DBRvJkW3B1EZILRRtWFcwpRargktFW8/Txc2bBtbCc=; h=Message-ID:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type: Date; b=hq3QCAcRKf3SJIsZa9hDqvNJg+OVUkq0sGVj4w7aVvS08vr+NdhQI5M07fPmtDdCc/65xfZN7z/U5ntN5MEs7liDFiFgtbmMCgd4tRFSiBE5qhz7efYVoL9SK2b/quVcDkjNMvLWqfXeQ/YEKn8H+cb6KhjRUKyfhv8y8Nh/kDo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=G6Ixt71v; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="G6Ixt71v" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 35E431F00893 for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2026 08:33:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1791966835; bh=k3Kb+m8om1gb4Ggi+E5Hwsf+oXvRn3xL6jKBMirABS4=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=G6Ixt71veteMWD5z9/flhzqqm0LBSAAS9Veb6sKPjgdMrOgdcTbblxA7oP8pPWLDb 4G9v4uoQqSOXeCiLXqbaCexfkb/6szS4iB5gZPZeEFmYsF/gycUfRTNGSQ0QAZThkj gBj+uenYmrUom5KeTMv/NI56XgRwJGJ/Ov0d6eFr0TlhZDKnEhWLX9cRacDnKfBFWx sOZWmZXQv/kpLL2/qcRA/cXTdJC8SvhxLr5qEX4vP+BAnLqIlVTdwkpwNMxzvcDhvj 2QbubUylnDUUJRwnq/HeiXbgopui4wDLcS6bq0naKqHHrl/dqjElZlH6NGreMZRpza IhHYqFJofHbNw== Message-ID: From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/8] landlock: Rename quiet_masks to quiet_access Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20261014082718.1435842-2-mic@digikod.net> References: <20261014082718.1435842-1-mic@digikod.net> <20261014082718.1435842-2-mic@digikod.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2026 08:33:54 +0000 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > The base stores the fs/net/scope quiet bitmasks in a struct access_masks > field named quiet_masks. A following commit adds the sibling struct > permission_masks field quiet_permission for capabilities and namespaces. > quiet_masks drops the access category and keeps the type half ("masks"), > while quiet_permission keeps the category and drops the type half, so > the two read as an inconsistent pair. >=20 > Rename the base field to quiet_access, giving the symmetric, > category-named pair quiet_access/quiet_permission that also matches the > UAPI handled_access_*/quiet_access_* naming. This is a > no-functional-change rename. >=20 > Cc: G=C3=BCnther Noack > Cc: Tingmao Wang > Reviewed-by: Tingmao Wang > Signed-off-by: Micka=C3=ABl Sala=C3=BCn Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261014082718.1435= 842-1-mic@digikod.net?part=3D1