Linux Security Modules development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] landlock: Mediate CAP_SYS_RAWIO for mappings below mmap_min_addr
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2026 20:33:50 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-207713@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261110202436.2408244-3-mic@digikod.net>

> Until now, a process in a domain that denies CAP_SYS_RAWIO could still
> map memory below the vm.mmap_min_addr limit if it held this capability.
> cap_mmap_addr() is commoncap's mmap_addr hook, and it checks
> CAP_SYS_RAWIO with cap_capable(), not security_capable(), so the check
> never reaches hook_capable().  Mapping the lowest pages is what this
> limit protects against, because it helps to exploit kernel NULL pointer
> dereferences.
> 
> Add a Landlock mmap_addr hook that checks CAP_SYS_RAWIO against the
> domain under the same condition as cap_mmap_addr().  With the same
> vm.mmap_min_addr value, the hook only denies mappings for which
> commoncap required the capability.  security_mmap_addr() stops at
> commoncap's error, so processes without the capability get the same
> result as before.  This also covers the x86 vm86() syscalls, which use
> the same check for address 0.
> 
> Making cap_mmap_addr() call capable() would also fix this, but it would
> send every low mapping through the capable hook of all LSMs (SELinux,
> AppArmor, SafeSetID, BPF LSM programs), adding capability checks that
> their policies never had to handle.  For instance, SELinux checks
> mmap_zero in its own mmap_addr hook and keeps it separate from the
> capability on purpose.  LSMs with their own policy for low mappings
> implement it in this hook, so Landlock does the same.
> 
> Cc: Günther Noack <gnoack@google.com>
> Cc: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
> Cc: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>
> Reported-by: Ada Smith <adasmithgt@gmail.com>
> Fixes: 97c8386f1d74 ("landlock: Enforce capability restrictions")
> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>

Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261110202436.2408244-1-mic@digikod.net?part=2


  reply	other threads:[~2026-11-10 20:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-10 20:24 [PATCH 0/6] Fix Landlock mediation of commoncap's capability checks Mickaël Salaün
2026-11-10 20:24 ` [PATCH 1/6] landlock: Factor out capability denial checks Mickaël Salaün
2026-11-10 20:28   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10 20:24 ` [PATCH 2/6] landlock: Mediate CAP_SYS_RAWIO for mappings below mmap_min_addr Mickaël Salaün
2026-11-10 20:33   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-10 20:24 ` [PATCH 3/6] landlock: Mediate CAP_SETPCAP for inheritable capabilities Mickaël Salaün
2026-11-10 20:36   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10 20:24 ` [PATCH 4/6] landlock: Mediate CAP_SYS_ADMIN for the admin memory reserve Mickaël Salaün
2026-11-10 20:40   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10 20:24 ` [PATCH 5/6] selftests/landlock: Test capability checks outside the capable hook Mickaël Salaün
2026-11-10 20:54   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10 20:24 ` [PATCH 6/6] landlock: Fix capability restriction documentation Mickaël Salaün
2026-11-10 20:55   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-207713@kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox