From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] selftests/landlock: Test PR_SET_SECUREBITS mediation
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2026 02:06:31 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-208066@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261110202811.2409395-3-mic@digikod.net>
> The preceding commoncap fix routes the CAP_SETPCAP check for privileged
> PR_SET_SECUREBITS requests through the ordinary capable hooks. Add a
> focused Landlock regression test for this path.
>
> Keep CAP_SETPCAP effective to isolate Landlock mediation and run the
> audit case in a child domain. A privileged change returns EPERM and
> emits an exact CAP_SETPCAP record, then an unprivileged-only change
> succeeds. After the child exits, require the domain deallocation record
> to report exactly one denial; this proves that the second operation did
> not create a hidden denial without relying on an asynchronous no-record
> timeout.
>
> The existing check-exec securebits fixture already covers commoncap's
> privileged, unprivileged, locked, and user-namespace semantics. Without
> the preceding fix, this Landlock audit test fails.
>
> Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
> Cc: Günther Noack <gnoack@google.com>
> Cc: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
> Cc: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261110202811.2409395-1-mic@digikod.net?part=2
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-11 2:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-10 20:28 [PATCH 0/2] Fix LSM mediation of PR_SET_SECUREBITS Mickaël Salaün
2026-11-10 20:28 ` [PATCH 1/2] capabilities: Check PR_SET_SECUREBITS with ns_capable() Mickaël Salaün
2026-11-11 1:58 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10 20:28 ` [PATCH 2/2] selftests/landlock: Test PR_SET_SECUREBITS mediation Mickaël Salaün
2026-11-11 2:06 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-208066@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox