From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ian Subject: Re: Line disciplines. Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 23:57:59 +0100 Message-ID: <1216162679.11481.47.camel@wirenth> References: <1216152625.11481.38.camel@wirenth> <487D18A9.20304@microgate.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mk-outboundfilter-4.mail.uk.tiscali.com ([212.74.114.32]:65362 "EHLO mk-outboundfilter-4.mail.uk.tiscali.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755550AbYGOW6D (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jul 2008 18:58:03 -0400 In-Reply-To: <487D18A9.20304@microgate.com> Sender: linux-serial-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org To: Paul Fulghum Cc: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2008-07-15 at 15:37 -0600, Paul Fulghum wrote: > I suspect that since you are using an existing ldisc number > that the existing ldisc module is being loaded instead of > your module. I dont think this is the case, and looking in /proc my line disc was listed with the number 2. there were no others other than n_tty > Do you see the init routine of your module called? Yes. > If so, what is the return value from tty_register_ldisc()? Offhand I cant recall (several days ago) but since the ldisc appeared in /proc/tty/ldiscs I would have thought this succeded? -Ian